{"paper":{"title":"Synchronization Strings: List Decoding for Insertions and Deletions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DS","math.IT"],"primary_cat":"cs.IT","authors_text":"Amirbehshad Shahrasbi, Bernhard Haeupler, Madhu Sudan","submitted_at":"2018-02-23T18:09:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study codes that are list-decodable under insertions and deletions. Specifically, we consider the setting where a codeword over some finite alphabet of size $q$ may suffer from $\\delta$ fraction of adversarial deletions and $\\gamma$ fraction of adversarial insertions. A code is said to be $L$-list-decodable if there is an (efficient) algorithm that, given a received word, reports a list of $L$ codewords that include the original codeword.\n  Using the concept of synchronization strings, introduced by the first two authors [STOC 2017], we show some surprising results. We show that for every $"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1802.08663","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}