{"paper":{"title":"Strain-Engineering Mott-Insulating La$_2$CuO$_4$","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.supr-con"],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.str-el","authors_text":"C. Adamo, C. Lichtensteiger, D. E. McNally, E. Paris, H. I. Wei, H. M. R{\\o}nnow, J. Chang, J. M. Tomczak, K. M. Shen, M. Gibert, M. Horio, M. R. Beasley, N. B. Christensen, N. E. Shaik, O. Ivashko, T. Schmitt, W. Wan, Y. Tseng","submitted_at":"2018-05-18T12:34:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"The transition temperature $T_\\textrm{c}$ of unconventional superconductivity is often tunable. For a monolayer of FeSe, for example, the sweet spot is uniquely bound to titanium-oxide substrates. By contrast for La$_{2-\\mathrm{x}}$Sr$_\\mathrm{x}$CuO$_4$ thin films, such substrates are sub-optimal and the highest $T_\\textrm{c}$ is instead obtained using LaSrAlO$_4$. An outstanding challenge is thus to understand the optimal conditions for superconductivity in thin films: which microscopic parameters drive the change in $T_\\mathrm{c}$ and how can we tune them? Here we demonstrate, by a combinat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1805.07173","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}