{"paper":{"title":"Where Trust Fails: Mapping Location-Data Provenance Risks in Europe","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"European digital sovereignty requires credible location evidence that withstands adversarial pressure.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Eduardo Brito, Liina Kamm","submitted_at":"2026-04-15T09:36:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"European digital sovereignty and security increasingly depend on whether high-impact decisions can be grounded in location evidence that remains credible under adversarial pressure. This paper frames a cross-sector analysis as a location-data provenance problem: whether there is contestable evidence about where and when an asserted event occurred, who or what produced the assertion, what a device or service reported as location, and which audit and retention guarantees apply. Trust-erosion patterns are observable across democratic processes and the information environment, trade and origin-sen"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"European digital sovereignty and security depends on credible location evidence under adversarial pressure; location should be represented as evidence-bearing claims rather than self-asserted coordinates, with proof-of-location mechanisms positioned as a candidate capability layer for verifiable presence claims under explicit threat and privacy assumptions.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That observable patterns show a recurring asymmetry where locality or presence can be asserted cheaply while institutions face costly reconstruction in disputes, and that PoL mechanisms can be designed to be privacy- and rights-compatible.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"The paper maps recurring location-data provenance risks across European sectors and introduces a risk taxonomy plus design expectations for proof-of-location mechanisms to support contestable, privacy-compatible digital trust.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"European digital sovereignty requires credible location evidence that withstands adversarial pressure.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"04a860d4da8ea705bf5b38de2ec49cf4c55fcfff63c2080225ca51b88e978303"},"source":{"id":"2604.13668","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"0417a363-246e-4aab-bb03-f9f1e908bdbb","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-10T13:16:04.840438Z","strongest_claim":"European digital sovereignty and security depends on credible location evidence under adversarial pressure; location should be represented as evidence-bearing claims rather than self-asserted coordinates, with proof-of-location mechanisms positioned as a candidate capability layer for verifiable presence claims under explicit threat and privacy assumptions.","one_line_summary":"The paper maps recurring location-data provenance risks across European sectors and introduces a risk taxonomy plus design expectations for proof-of-location mechanisms to support contestable, privacy-compatible digital trust.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That observable patterns show a recurring asymmetry where locality or presence can be asserted cheaply while institutions face costly reconstruction in disputes, and that PoL mechanisms can be designed to be privacy- and rights-compatible.","pith_extraction_headline":"European digital sovereignty requires credible location evidence that withstands adversarial pressure."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.13668/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}