{"paper":{"title":"Remaining problems with the \"New Crown Indicator\" (MNCS) of the CWTS","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.soc-ph"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Loet Leydesdorff, Tobias Opthof","submitted_at":"2010-10-12T13:04:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"In their article, entitled \"Towards a new crown indicator: some theoretical considerations,\" Waltman et al. (2010; at arXiv:1003.2167) show that the \"old crown indicator\" of CWTS in Leiden was mathematically inconsistent and that one should move to the normalization as applied in the \"new crown indicator.\" Although we now agree about the statistical normalization, the \"new crown indicator\" inherits the scientometric problems of the \"old\" one in treating subject categories of journals as a standard for normalizing differences in citation behavior among fields of science.\n  We further note that "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1010.2379","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}