{"paper":{"title":"A Study of Belief Revision Postulates in Multi-Agent Systems (Extended Version)","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"The classical AGM belief revision postulates can be generalized to multi-agent epistemic planning using Kripke models.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Michael Thielscher, Tran Cao Son","submitted_at":"2026-05-04T05:46:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"We investigate the belief revision problem in epistemic planning, i.e., what will be the beliefs of all agents in a multi-agent system after an agent gains the belief in some state property. Based on the standard representation in epistemic planning of agents' beliefs via a single multi-agent Kripke model, we generalize the classical AGM belief revision postulates to the multi-agent setting, with the aim to provide a formal framework for evaluating dynamic epistemic reasoning frameworks in which the beliefs of all agents as the result of actions are computed. As an example of a simple operator"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We generalize the classical AGM belief revision postulates to the multi-agent setting, with the aim to provide a formal framework for evaluating dynamic epistemic reasoning frameworks in which the beliefs of all agents as the result of actions are computed.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That agents' beliefs in epistemic planning are adequately captured by a single multi-agent Kripke model, allowing the AGM postulates to be lifted without loss of essential properties.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Generalizes AGM belief revision postulates to multi-agent systems via Kripke models, provides satisfying operators like generalized full-meet revision, and discusses challenges for iterated revision.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"The classical AGM belief revision postulates can be generalized to multi-agent epistemic planning using Kripke models.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"fbcb43a26d52e47c8c4c666ce89bcc428ce595c0868f075168f7addbc4042bed"},"source":{"id":"2605.02249","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"77e8dcfb-16c7-42bf-b04b-1ce546502080","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-09T16:25:40.454964Z","strongest_claim":"We generalize the classical AGM belief revision postulates to the multi-agent setting, with the aim to provide a formal framework for evaluating dynamic epistemic reasoning frameworks in which the beliefs of all agents as the result of actions are computed.","one_line_summary":"Generalizes AGM belief revision postulates to multi-agent systems via Kripke models, provides satisfying operators like generalized full-meet revision, and discusses challenges for iterated revision.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That agents' beliefs in epistemic planning are adequately captured by a single multi-agent Kripke model, allowing the AGM postulates to be lifted without loss of essential properties.","pith_extraction_headline":"The classical AGM belief revision postulates can be generalized to multi-agent epistemic planning using Kripke models."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.02249/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-20T16:35:28.031092Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-20T03:31:23.067605Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T16:31:32.052379Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"9fb40f9ed73bb5eed042ab81e3aaa363189589f3bff02a3db4de7c4a909db776"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}