{"paper":{"title":"Reply to comment by Witte et al. on \"Isochoric, isobaric, and ultrafast conductivities of aluminum, lithium,and carbon in the warm dense matter regime\", Phys. Rev. E $96$, 053206 (2017)","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.plasm-ph"],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.stat-mech","authors_text":"D. D. Klug, Laurent J. Lewis, L. Harbour, M.W.C. Dharma-wardana (NRC-Canada)","submitted_at":"2019-05-08T00:58:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"In Phys. Rev. E, $99$, 047201 (2019) Witte {\\it et al.} have commented on our conductivity calculations [Phys. Rev. E $96$, 053206 (2017)] for warm dense matter (WDM). (i) They criticize our use of the spherically-averaged structure factor $S(k)$ for calculations of the static conductivity $\\sigma$ of FCC aluminum - a common approximation for polycrystalline materials. They themselves give no calculations as their method using density-functional theory (DFT) and molecular dynamics (MD) based Kubo-Greenwood (KG) calculations becomes impractical for cold ions. (ii) We are satisfied that Witte et"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1905.02855","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}