{"paper":{"title":"Role of crystal structure and junction morphology on interface thermal conductance","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.mes-hall","authors_text":"Avik W. Ghosh, Carlos A. Polanco, Jingjie Zhang, Nam Q. Le, Pamela M. Norris, Patrick E. Hopkins, Rouzbeh Rastgarkafshgarkolaei","submitted_at":"2015-07-15T18:50:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"We argue that the relative thermal conductance between interfaces with different morphologies is controlled by crystal structure through $M_{min}/M_c > 1$, the ratio between the {\\it minimum mode} count on either side $M_{min}$, and the {\\it conserving modes} $M_c$ that preserve phonon momentum transverse to the interface. Junctions with an added homogenous layer, \"uniform\", and \"abrupt\" junctions are limited to $M_c$ while junctions with interfacial disorder, \"mixed\", exploit the expansion of mode spectrum to $M_{min}$. In our studies with cubic crystals, the largest enhancement of conductanc"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1507.04322","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}