{"paper":{"title":"Revisiting the 'LSND anomaly' I: impact of new data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ex","authors_text":"A. De Min, A. Elagin, A. Guskov, A. Semak, A. Zhemchugov, D. Dedovitch, D. Emelyanov, E. Usenko, F. Dydak, G. Chelkov, I. Boyko, J. Wotschack, K. Nikolaev, M. Gostkin, The HARP-CDP group: A. Bolshakova, V. Ammosov, V. Gapienko, V. Koreshev, V. Zaets, Y. Nefedov, Y. Sviridov, Z. Kroumchtein","submitted_at":"2011-10-19T12:38:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper, together with a subsequent paper, questions the so-called 'LSND anomaly': a 3.8 {\\sigma} excess of anti-electronneutrino interactions over standard backgrounds, observed by the LSND Collaboration in a beam dump experiment with 800 MeV protons. That excess has been interpreted as evidence for the anti-muonneutrino{\\to} anti-electronneutrino oscillation in the {\\Delta}m2 range from 0.2 eV2 to 2 eV2. Such a {\\Delta}m2 range is incompatible with the widely accepted model of oscillations between three light neutrino species and would require the existence of at least one light 'sterile'"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1110.4265","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}