{"paper":{"title":"Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism Design: Consensus Planning Protocol Meets Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Mechanism","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Integrating Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanisms with the Consensus Planning Protocol preserves dominant-strategy truth-telling and efficiency for retailer-vendor supply chain coordination.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.TH","authors_text":"Dirk Bergemann, Garrett van Ryzin, Jiaxuan Li","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T23:18:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces the theoretical framework for combining Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanisms with the Consensus Planning Protocol (CPP) to enable truthful and efficient collaboration between a retailer and vendors to lower joint Cost to Serve. We demonstrate how this integration preserves both dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and efficiency in high-dimensional environments. We further introduce an activity fee design to improve its revenue property for the retailer while maintaining the mechanism's desirable properties. This CPP-VCG framework serves as the theoretical foundati"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"The integration of VCG mechanisms with the Consensus Planning Protocol preserves both dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and efficiency in high-dimensional environments.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the Consensus Planning Protocol can be integrated with VCG mechanisms without introducing incentive distortions or efficiency losses in the specific retailer-vendor supply chain setting.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"A CPP-VCG framework is introduced that preserves dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and efficiency for high-dimensional supply chain collaboration, augmented by an activity fee to improve retailer revenue.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Integrating Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanisms with the Consensus Planning Protocol preserves dominant-strategy truth-telling and efficiency for retailer-vendor supply chain coordination.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"60ab3529e7fb4c135de3f6a3901442bf3faed8b19903a872d424c13754b8226f"},"source":{"id":"2605.16695","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"568630ce-2229-4fa2-89ce-dab96334e539","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T20:44:27.418935Z","strongest_claim":"The integration of VCG mechanisms with the Consensus Planning Protocol preserves both dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and efficiency in high-dimensional environments.","one_line_summary":"A CPP-VCG framework is introduced that preserves dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and efficiency for high-dimensional supply chain collaboration, augmented by an activity fee to improve retailer revenue.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the Consensus Planning Protocol can be integrated with VCG mechanisms without introducing incentive distortions or efficiency losses in the specific retailer-vendor supply chain setting.","pith_extraction_headline":"Integrating Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanisms with the Consensus Planning Protocol preserves dominant-strategy truth-telling and efficiency for retailer-vendor supply chain coordination."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.16695/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:01:19.282783Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T20:51:13.392641Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:01:56.371258Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:33:26.492425Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"b52fc3d5bd5e428b0de308f29f8ce40270669909e2fdbb9969f9252337ac99d9"},"references":{"count":7,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Amazon Internal Paper , year=","work_id":"a9d717f6-0e6a-46b1-9836-6c3f9bbe54f1","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Amazon Internal Paper , year=","work_id":"d6be9f36-64e2-4343-91ff-f2cb9d82c2df","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2010,"title":"The dynamic pivot mechanism , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2010 , publisher=","work_id":"32601771-f7f1-4b25-a6ad-62b13da79403","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2019,"title":"Journal of Economic Literature , volume=","work_id":"12f5aa13-cdc9-415e-ab64-8918fdd77a6e","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"and Parikh, Neal and Chu, Eric and Peleato, Borja and Eckstein, Jonathan , journal =","work_id":"9593dc56-0c64-419a-9efc-0c0da05a6cd7","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":7,"snapshot_sha256":"e71ebdaa4dd512c3bcab3ae623daaef28d49b988c9e12a0c507ef719c780e9d9","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"525c0db984aedb46028e4b5393f50b73a24e3fb5b5fd4dfd619c96754eca2a91"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}