{"paper":{"title":"Reply to \"The equivalence of the Power-Zineau-Woolley picture and the Poincar{\\'e} gauge from the very first principles\" by G. K{\\'o}nya, et al","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Didier Felbacq (GES, Emmanuel Rousseau (L2C), L2C)","submitted_at":"2018-04-20T07:03:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"This note is a reply to the paper arXiv:1801.05590: \"The equivalence of the Power-Zineau-Woolley picture and the Poincar{\\'e} gauge from the very first principles\" by G. K{\\'o}nya, et al.\n  In a recent paper [2], we have shown that the Power-Zienau-Woolley Hamiltonian does not derived from the minimal-coupling hamiltonian with the help of a gauge transformation. This result has been challenged by G. K{\\'o}nya, al. in a comment 1 where the authors claim the equivalence between the Power-Zienau-Woolley hamiltonian  and the minimal-coupling hamiltonian in the Poincar{\\'e} gauge. They claim that w"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1804.07472","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}