{"paper":{"title":"Reply to \"Comment on \\emph{\"Precision global measurements of London penetration depth in Fe(Te$_{0.58}$Se$_{0.42}$)\"}\"","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.supr-con","authors_text":"H. Kim, K. Cho, M. A. Tanatar, R. Prozorov","submitted_at":"2012-07-15T21:11:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"We reply to the Comment by T. Klein, P. Rodi\\`{e}re and C. Marcenat (arXiv:1205.2566), on our paper, \"Precision global measurements of London penetration depth in FeTe$_{0.58}$Se$_{0.42}$\", Phys. Rev. B 84, 174502 (2011). Our work was motivated by Klein \\emph{et. al}, \"Thermodynamic phase diagram of Fe(Se$_{0.5}$Te$_{0.5}$) single crystals in fields up to 28 Tesla\", Phys. Rev. B 82, 184506 (2010). In their paper, Klein et al. have attributed a factor of five difference in the value of the London penetration depth obtained from their tunnel diode resonator (TDR) measurements and calculated from"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1207.3542","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}