{"paper":{"title":"On the covering radius of small codes versus dual distance","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.IT"],"primary_cat":"cs.IT","authors_text":"Louay Bazzi","submitted_at":"2017-07-20T17:38:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"Tiet\\\"{a}v\\\"{a}inen's upper and lower bounds assert that for block-length-$n$ linear codes with dual distance $d$, the covering radius $R$ is at most $\\frac{n}{2}-(\\frac{1}{2}-o(1))\\sqrt{dn}$ and typically at least $\\frac{n}{2}-\\Theta(\\sqrt{dn\\log{\\frac{n}{d}}})$. The gap between those bounds on $R -\\frac{n}{2}$ is an $\\Theta(\\sqrt{\\log{\\frac{n}{d}}})$ factor related to the gap between the worst covering radius given $d$ and the sphere-covering bound. Our focus in this paper is on the case when $d = o(n)$, i.e., when the code size is subexponential and the gap is $w(1)$. We show that up to a c"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1707.06628","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}