{"paper":{"title":"Cooperation between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Theorem Provers","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"D. Fuchs, M. Fuchs","submitted_at":"2011-05-27T01:52:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Top-down and bottom-up theorem proving approaches each    have specific advantages and disadvantages.  Bottom-up provers profit    from strong redundancy control but suffer from the lack of    goal-orientation, whereas top-down provers are goal-oriented but often    have weak calculi when their proof lengths are considered.  In order    to integrate both approaches, we try to achieve cooperation between a    top-down and a bottom-up prover in two different ways: The first    technique aims at supporting a bottom-up with a top-down prover. A    top-down prover generates subgoal clauses, they ar"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1105.5458","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}