{"paper":{"title":"Codes Correcting a Burst of Deletions or Insertions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.IT"],"primary_cat":"cs.IT","authors_text":"Antonia Wachter-Zeh, Clayton Schoeny, Eitan Yaakobi, Ryan Gabrys","submitted_at":"2016-02-22T15:38:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper studies codes that correct bursts of deletions. Namely, a code will be called a $b$-burst-deletion-correcting code if it can correct a deletion of any $b$ consecutive bits. While the lower bound on the redundancy of such codes was shown by Levenshtein to be asymptotically $\\log(n)+b-1$, the redundancy of the best code construction by Cheng et al. is $b(\\log (n/b+1))$. In this paper we close on this gap and provide codes with redundancy at most $\\log(n) + (b-1)\\log(\\log(n)) +b -\\log(b)$.\n  We also derive a non-asymptotic upper bound on the size of $b$-burst-deletion-correcting codes "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1602.06820","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}