{"paper":{"title":"Reply to \"Comment on 'Analysis of Recent Interpretations of the Abraham-Minkowski Problem'\"","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.class-ph","authors_text":"Iver Brevik","submitted_at":"2019-07-18T08:54:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Comment of M. Partanen and J. Tulkki [Phys. Rev. A {\\bf 100}, 017801 (2019)] claims that my criticism expressed in Phys. Rev. A {\\bf 98}, 043847 (2018) of the earlier paper of Partanen {\\it et al.} [Phys. Rev. A {\\bf 95}, 063850 (2017)] was incorrect. There are essentially three points involved here: (1) the first one regards the physical interpretation of the radiation pressure experiment of A. Kundu {\\it et al.} [Sci. Rep. {\\bf 7}, 42538 (2017)]. My mathematical analysis of this situation, although simple, was able to illustrate the main property of the experiment, namely that it showed "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1907.07927","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}