{"paper":{"title":"Self-healing of the Montgomery pattern","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"The Montgomery pattern recovers its transverse profile only at integer multiples of its self-imaging period after partial obstruction.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.optics","authors_text":"Alfonso Palmieri, Athena Xu, Ayman F. Abouraddy, Federico Capasso, Murat Yessenov, Oscar de Vries","submitted_at":"2026-05-18T12:37:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Self-healing -- the ability of a structured beam to reconstruct its transverse profile after partial obstruction -- has been demonstrated for diffraction-free beams, where the recovery distance varies continuously with obstruction size. Here, we investigate self-healing in the Montgomery pattern, a self-imaging of tightly localized optical fields. Using Babinet's principle, we show theoretically that the recovery distance is quantized in integer multiples of the self-imaging period -- a qualitative distinction from all previously studied self-healing beams. We confirm these predictions experim"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Using Babinet's principle, the recovery distance for the Montgomery pattern is quantized in integer multiples of the self-imaging period, a qualitative distinction from all previously studied self-healing beams.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The assumption that Babinet's principle applies directly to the partial obstruction of the Montgomery pattern without additional phase or amplitude effects from the specific self-imaging geometry or the holographic generation method.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Montgomery patterns self-heal with recovery distances quantized in integer multiples of the self-imaging period, shown via Babinet's principle and holographic experiments with obstructions up to 20 times the spot size.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"The Montgomery pattern recovers its transverse profile only at integer multiples of its self-imaging period after partial obstruction.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"f3f2fcd57945744f99893d83890da1f8c54b0630ad163ca66f4401c0e0b431eb"},"source":{"id":"2605.18318","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"6c35cb0a-c447-4b83-b2e2-07adfce815cf","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T23:50:55.292399Z","strongest_claim":"Using Babinet's principle, the recovery distance for the Montgomery pattern is quantized in integer multiples of the self-imaging period, a qualitative distinction from all previously studied self-healing beams.","one_line_summary":"Montgomery patterns self-heal with recovery distances quantized in integer multiples of the self-imaging period, shown via Babinet's principle and holographic experiments with obstructions up to 20 times the spot size.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The assumption that Babinet's principle applies directly to the partial obstruction of the Montgomery pattern without additional phase or amplitude effects from the specific self-imaging geometry or the holographic generation method.","pith_extraction_headline":"The Montgomery pattern recovers its transverse profile only at integer multiples of its self-imaging period after partial obstruction."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.18318/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:51.141749Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:20.453295Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T23:33:35.191120Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T23:21:58.867956Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"2c06c72641f6fbb819d8c08de7004ec7f43d696ddb0c2225049ebde3587cd716"},"references":{"count":36,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"H. F. Talbot, Philos. Mag.9, 401 (1836)","work_id":"0dc87d06-2d1f-4aad-9bea-2e38b222eba4","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1967,"title":"W. D. Montgomery, J. Opt. Soc. Am.57, 772 (1967)","work_id":"b5eba3c6-a6ed-4af7-a0fb-5a9bc0b4297d","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"J. Jahns, H. Knuppertz, and A. W. Lohmann, Optics Communications225, 13","work_id":"3a4527e9-5e50-42ec-a817-3da016cbf940","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1992,"title":"Indebetouw, Journal of the Optical Society of America A9, 549 (1992)","work_id":"c83e2184-113d-457e-b6e3-8dadbe6e4c65","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2005,"title":"A. W. Lohmann, H. Knuppertz, and J. Jahns, JOSA A 22, 1500 (2005)","work_id":"6dd7d72f-ab5e-4d18-b261-d98ddb23d3b0","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":36,"snapshot_sha256":"f8a0446ab3ef2b17a6cef00171b86823a963472024bfc359246b4dcfaec0a59b","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}