{"arxiv_id":"1001.1737","incoming":{"papers":16,"sentences":21,"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses its method or tool","papers":8,"sentences":11,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2512.23157","title":"The GLASS-JWST Early Release Science Program. V. H$\\alpha$ luminosity functions at $z\\sim1.3$ and $z\\sim2.0$","url":"/paper/2512.23157","section":"LF results","sentence":"When calculating the errors, we consider Poisson noise for the small number statistics [ref] and also include the uncertainty caused by cosmic variance following the methods in [ref] , which estimates large-scale density fluctuations as the product of the galaxy bias [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2604.05022","title":"PANORAMIC: The Dawn of Massive Quiescent Galaxies I. Number Density and Cosmic Variance from 1000 arcmin$^2$ NIRCam Imaging","url":"/paper/2604.05022","section":"Method","sentence":"To estimate $σ̃_CV$, we use the code developed by [ref] , which is based on the [ref] cosmic-variance calculator, combined with constraints from the UniverseMachine simulations [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2512.14212","title":"Exploring Cosmic Dawn with PANORAMIC II: Cosmic Variance and Galaxy Clustering at $z\\sim10$","url":"/paper/2512.14212","section":"Bootstrapping","sentence":"following e.g. [ref] and [ref] where N stands for the completeness corrected galaxy number counts per field, $μ=⟨N⟩$ is the mean number count, and we make use of the fact that the Poisson contribution to the variance is $σ_Poisson^2=⟨N⟩$.","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1009.0269","title":"The Most Massive Galaxies at 3.010^11$ M$_$, resulting in an uncertainty due to cosmic variance of 0.18 dex, in very good agreement with our empirical estimate.","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2608.08203","title":"A New Window on the H{\\alpha} Luminosity Function and Star Formation Rate Density from 1.2 < z < 6.6 from JWST Medium-Band Photometry","url":"/paper/2608.08203","section":"Redshift Evolution","sentence":"Uncertainties from cosmic variance are incorporated directly in the Monte Carlo by perturbing each realization with a field-combined fractional cosmic variance term estimated from the [ref] calculator, combining the CANUCS pointings as independent volumes following [ref] .","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"supports_this_paper","label":"Cites it as support","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2605.11077","title":"The Impact of Cosmic Variance and Satellites on JWST Clustering Measurements at Redshift around 6","url":"/paper/2605.11077","section":"Introduction","sentence":"The narrow pencil-beam fields of JWST/WFSS ($≈2' ×2'$ each) make cosmic variance the dominant source of uncertainty [ref] , and the highly biased tracers at $z > 5$ further amplify the effect.","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":3,"sentences":3,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2512.14212","title":"Exploring Cosmic Dawn with PANORAMIC II: Cosmic Variance and Galaxy Clustering at $z\\sim10$","url":"/paper/2512.14212","section":"Introduction","sentence":"They are therefore subject to significant cosmic variance, which describes fluctuations in the number density of galaxies because of their clustering in the cosmic web [ref] .","intent_p":0.95,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2604.05022","title":"PANORAMIC: The Dawn of Massive Quiescent Galaxies I. Number Density and Cosmic Variance from 1000 arcmin$^2$ NIRCam Imaging","url":"/paper/2604.05022","section":"Cosmic variance of massive quiescent galaxies at redshift $z∼3$–8","sentence":"In pencil-beam surveys, these fluctuations are often dominated by cosmic variance, i.e., the clustering-driven excess (relative to Poisson) variance obtained by integrating the power spectrum weighted by the survey window function [ref] .","intent_p":0.92,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2305.04520","title":"Minkowski Functionals of Large-Scale Structure as a Probe of Modified Gravity","url":"/paper/2305.04520","section":"Cosmic variance","sentence":"It is important for both cosmological parameter estimation and future survey design, and it has been extensively studied for various LSS statistics [ref] .","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":6},"outgoing":{"papers":1,"sentences":5,"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses data or values from","papers":1,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"0903.4682","title":"Constraints on the relationship between stellar mass and halo mass at low and high redshift","url":"/paper/0903.4682","section":"Conclusions","sentence":"We have used the galaxy bias predictions by [ref] (for six stellar mass bins and six thresholds) and the dark matter cosmic variance to compute the cosmic variance for galaxies.","intent_p":0.83,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":3},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":{"arxiv_id":"1001.1737","kind":"model","paper_version":1,"prompt_version":"held-up-v3.5","generated_at":"2026-10-27T17:06:56+00:00","loaded_at":"2026-10-28T01:02:53.618414+00:00","evidence":"substantial","account":[],"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses its method or tool","papers":15,"entries":[{"p":1.0,"quote":{"text":"To estimate $σ̃_CV$, we use the code developed by [ref] , which is based on the [ref] cosmic-variance calculator, combined with constraints from the UniverseMachine simulations [ref] .","citing":"2604.05022","section":"Method"},"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2026,"title":"PANORAMIC: The Dawn of Massive Quiescent Galaxies I. Number Density and Cosmic Variance from 1000 arcmin$^2$ NIRCam Imaging","arxiv_id":"2604.05022"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Used a code based on this paper's cosmic-variance calculator, combined with constraints from the UniverseMachine simulations, to estimate cosmic variance."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2021,"title":"Evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function: evidence for an increasing $M^*$ from $z=2$ to the present day","arxiv_id":"2101.07182"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Used this paper's treatment, which estimates cosmic variance as a function of both stellar mass and redshift, to model the effects of cosmic variance on its measurements."},{"p":0.97,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2025,"title":"Exploring Cosmic Dawn with PANORAMIC II: Cosmic Variance and Galaxy Clustering at $z\\sim10$","arxiv_id":"2512.14212"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Followed this paper and another work in using the Poisson contribution to the variance as the mean number count."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2020,"title":"The Number Densities and Stellar Populations of Massive Galaxies at 3 < z < 6: A Diverse, Rapidly Forming Population in the Early Universe","arxiv_id":"2010.04725"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Estimated the contribution of cosmic variance to its total error budget using this paper's prescription."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2023,"title":"Modeling the JWST high-redshift galaxies with a general formation scenario and the consistency with the $\\Lambda$CDM model","arxiv_id":"2307.12487"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Followed this paper in calculating cosmic variance."},{"p":0.98,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2010,"title":"The Most Massive Galaxies at 3.010^11 M_sun, obtaining 0.18 dex."},{"p":0.99,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2024,"title":"SCUBADive I: JWST+ALMA Analysis of 289 sub-millimeter galaxies in COSMOS-Web","arxiv_id":"2408.08346"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Outlined its method for calculating the volume density uncertainty from cosmic variance, which follows the formalism developed by this paper."},{"p":0.97,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2020,"title":"On the (Lack of) Evolution of the Stellar Mass Function of Massive Galaxies from $z$=1.5 to 0.4","arxiv_id":"2002.07189"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Used the formalism set by this paper to estimate the relative cosmic variance of galaxies more massive than 10^11 M_sun at z=0.35 for COSMOS and SHELA."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2022,"title":"Galaxy luminosity functions at redshifts 0.6 to 1.2 in the Chandra Deep Field South","arxiv_id":"2203.03563"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Obtained average fractional cosmic variance from this paper's method for its average stellar masses in two redshift bins."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2023,"title":"MIGHTEE-HI: The first MeerKAT HI mass function from an untargeted interferometric survey","arxiv_id":"2304.13051"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Evaluated the uncertainty due to sample variance for MIGHTEE following the prescriptions from this paper's cosmic variance cookbook."},{"p":0.9,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2020,"title":"The Synthetic Emission Line COSMOS catalog: H$\\alpha$ and [OII] galaxy luminosity functions and counts at $0.3