{"arxiv_id":"1002.4518","incoming":{"papers":3,"sentences":4,"groups":[{"kind":"supports_this_paper","label":"Cites it as support","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1010.3181","title":"The Effects of a Family Non-universal Z' Boson in the \\bar{B}_s->\\pi K, \\pi K*, \\rho K Decays and B_d-\\bar{B_d} mixing","url":"/paper/1010.3181","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Especially, due to large theoretical uncertainty vanishing, the ratio $B(B̅_s→ρ^- K^+)/B(B̅_s→π^- K^+)$ is much more suitable to test SM and probe NP [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1010.3181","title":"The Effects of a Family Non-universal Z' Boson in the \\bar{B}_s->\\pi K, \\pi K*, \\rho K Decays and B_d-\\bar{B_d} mixing","url":"/paper/1010.3181","section":"Introduction","sentence":"For this possible branching ratio mismatch, many efforts have been done within both SM and possible New Physics (NP) scenarios, for example Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.91,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":2},"outgoing":{"papers":25,"sentences":41,"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses the method or tool of","papers":1,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0308039","title":"QCD factorization for B->PP and B->PV decays","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0308039","section":"$B_d,s →π^∓K^±$ decays","sentence":"In QCDF [ref] , [equation] where the weak annihilation contributions are contained in $β$ terms, while all the other parts are grouped into $α$ terms, including the vertex corrections and the hard spectator scattering contributions.","intent_p":0.89,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses data or values from","papers":5,"sentences":7,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0406184","title":"CP Violation and the CKM Matrix: Assessing the Impact of the Asymmetric B Factories","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0406184","section":"$B_d,s →π^∓K^±$ decays","sentence":"With the CKM parameters taken from CKMfitter [ref] : [equation] , the determination of $|V_ub |F^Bπ=(9.1 ±0.7)×10^-4$ [ref] from the semi-leptonic $B →πℓν̅$ decay and $τ_B_d=1.525 ±0.009$ ps [ref] , we obtain [equation] with the uncertainties coming mainly from the variation of $|V_ub |F^Bπ$.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0808.1297","title":"Averages of b-hadron and c-hadron Properties at the End of 2007","url":"/paper/0808.1297","section":"$B_d,s →π^∓K^±$ decays","sentence":"With the CKM parameters taken from CKMfitter [ref] : [equation] , the determination of $|V_ub |F^Bπ=(9.1 ±0.7)×10^-4$ [ref] from the semi-leptonic $B →πℓν̅$ decay and $τ_B_d=1.525 ±0.009$ ps [ref] , we obtain [equation] with the uncertainties coming mainly from the variation of $|V_ub |F^Bπ$.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0611108","title":"|V_ub| from UTangles and B->pi l nu","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0611108","section":"$B_d,s →π^∓K^±$ decays","sentence":"With the CKM parameters taken from CKMfitter [ref] : [equation] , the determination of $|V_ub |F^Bπ=(9.1 ±0.7)×10^-4$ [ref] from the semi-leptonic $B →πℓν̅$ decay and $τ_B_d=1.525 ±0.009$ ps [ref] , we obtain [equation] with the uncertainties coming mainly from the variation of $|V_ub |F^Bπ$.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0812.4271","title":"Observation of New Charmless Decays of Bottom Hadrons","url":"/paper/0812.4271","section":"$B_d,s →π^∓K^±$ decays","sentence":"Recently the CDF Collaboration reported new results on the branching ratios and direct CP violation for $B^0_d,s$ decay channels [ref] , among them is the first observation of $B_s →π^+ K^-$ decay: [equation] where the first errors are statistical and the second systematic.","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0805.4170","title":"B, Bs -> K form factors: an update of light-cone sum rule results","url":"/paper/0805.4170","section":"Summary","sentence":"Then we obtain [equation] With the light cone sum rules estimation [ref] $F^B_sK/F^Bπ=1.15^+0.17_-0.09$ and the QCDF prediction of $T$, the expected branching ratio would be $8.8^+3.1_-1.9 ×10^-6$, much larger than the CDF observation $(5.0 ±1.1) ×10^-6$.","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"supports_this_paper","label":"Cites as support","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0503022","title":"Is observed direct CP violation in $B_d \\to K^+ \\pi^-$ due to new physics? Check standard model prediction of equal violation in $B_s \\to K^- \\pi^+$","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0503022","section":"$B_d,s →π^∓K^±$ decays","sentence":"As observed in [ref] , the flavor symmetry breaking effects in $B_d,s →π^∓K^±$ should be unusually small due to charge conjugation which is a strict symmetry for the strong phases from final state interactions.","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites as background","papers":11,"sentences":11,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/9703353","title":"Charming Penguins in B decays","url":"/paper/hep-ph/9703353","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Consequently these charming penguin amplitudes[It was first proposed in [ref] that the charming penguins may play an important role in charmless B decays.] can only be determined by fitting to the data.","intent_p":0.84,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0104126","title":"Charming Penguins Strike Back","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0104126","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Consequently these charming penguin amplitudes[It was first proposed in [ref] that the charming penguins may play an important role in charmless B decays.] can only be determined by fitting to the data.","intent_p":0.84,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0004213","title":"Branching Ratio and CP Violation of B to pi pi Decays in Perturbative QCD Approach","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0004213","section":"Introduction","sentence":"For charmless B decays, there are three factorization approaches available in the market: QCDF [ref] , the perturbative QCD method (PQCD) [ref] and soft collinear effective theory (SCET) [ref] .","intent_p":0.95,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0006124","title":"QCD factorization for exclusive, non-leptonic B meson decays: General arguments and the case of heavy-light final states","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0006124","section":"Introduction","sentence":"For charmless B decays, there are three factorization approaches available in the market: QCDF [ref] , the perturbative QCD method (PQCD) [ref] and soft collinear effective theory (SCET) [ref] .","intent_p":0.95,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0011336","title":"An effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: heavy to light decays","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0011336","section":"Introduction","sentence":"For charmless B decays, there are three factorization approaches available in the market: QCDF [ref] , the perturbative QCD method (PQCD) [ref] and soft collinear effective theory (SCET) [ref] .","intent_p":0.95,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":20},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/1002.4518"}}