{"arxiv_id":"1007.3743","incoming":{"papers":6,"sentences":12,"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1104.3156","title":"Galaxy Evolution in Cosmological Simulations with Outflows II: Metallicities and Gas Fractions","url":"/paper/1104.3156","section":"Comparisons to Data","sentence":"The $z=0$ metallicity observations are taken from [ref] , and the gas fraction data from a compilation by [ref] .","intent_p":0.9,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1005.4691","title":"Radiation Pressure Driven Galactic Winds from Self-Gravitating Discs","url":"/paper/1005.4691","section":"Introduction","sentence":"They are important for determining the chemical evolution of galaxies and the mass-metallicity relation ( [ref] ; [ref] ; [ref] ; [ref] ; [ref] ), and as a primary source of metals in the intergalactic medium (IGM; e.g., [ref] ).","intent_p":0.8,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":10},"outgoing":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":{"arxiv_id":"1007.3743","kind":"model","paper_version":2,"prompt_version":"held-up-v3.5","generated_at":"2026-10-27T20:06:19+00:00","loaded_at":"2026-10-28T01:03:41.376106+00:00","evidence":"substantial","account":[],"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses its method or tool","papers":2,"entries":[{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2019,"title":"From 'bathtub' galaxy evolution models to metallicity gradients","arxiv_id":"1903.05105"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Used the star formation history of each model galaxy to derive a stellar mass, halo mass and virial velocity as a function of time following this paper's formalism."},{"p":0.91,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2013,"title":"Empirical Constraints for the Magnitude and Composition of Galactic Winds","arxiv_id":"1307.5909"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Derived the evolving virial velocity of each galaxy from the halo mass as a function of redshift and stellar mass using Equation 19 in this paper."}],"papers_all":3,"self_papers":0,"self_entries":[]},{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":1,"entries":[{"p":0.9,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2011,"title":"Galaxy Evolution in Cosmological Simulations with Outflows II: Metallicities and Gas Fractions","arxiv_id":"1104.3156"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Took the z=0 gas fraction data from a compilation by this paper."}],"papers_all":1,"self_papers":0,"self_entries":[]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with it","papers":1,"entries":[{"p":0.99,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2022,"title":"Constraints on galactic outflows from the metallicity-stellar mass-SFR relation of EAGLE simulation and SDSS galaxies","arxiv_id":"2212.01402"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Reported that its own constraint is slightly higher than the empirical constraints from this paper using the MZR derived in other works."}],"papers_all":7,"self_papers":0,"self_entries":[]}],"counts":{"by_kind":{"contests":2,"data_used":1,"comparison":7,"method_or_tool":3,"supports_this_paper":5},"dropped":{"relied_on":0,"unknown_ids":0,"account_lines":0,"contest_vetoed":0,"below_threshold":0,"contest_drawback":0,"contest_without_basis":0,"contest_not_one_sentence":0,"contest_on_group_citation":0},"papers_read":16,"self_papers":5,"citing_papers":69,"sentences_read":22,"citing_sentences":129,"unambiguous_read":22,"typed_independent":14,"independent_papers":64,"by_kind_independent":{"contests":2,"data_used":1,"comparison":6,"method_or_tool":3,"supports_this_paper":5}},"input_sha256":"ea708ce9cded982a2f8cfb7a8b4d6aa3bd0c4b010fb697f2a870206fa4ca74b3","method":"For a paper with five or more citing arXiv papers, Pith selected up to 40 citing sentences its citation classifier typed, read those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote one paraphrase for each later paper in each group, each resting on one sentence. A later paper is listed under a label only when the classifier gives one of its sentences that label at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading of the sentence finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check of the paraphrase against the sentence passes. The section lists uses only: building on the paper, using its method, tool, data or values, comparing with it and citing it as support. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence says nothing about how the paper has been received. Code counted the papers, wrote the summary from the listed entries, set the evidence level and linked each entry to its citing paper. Quotes are copied from the citing sentence and shown only when the citing paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0; otherwise the paraphrase is shown. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart. A paper with fewer citing papers gets a line counted by code, which names uses only: a later paper whose only label is a contest is counted as not described.","line":null,"summary":"4 later papers by other authors are listed below: 2 used its method or tool, 1 used its data or values and 1 compared its own results with it."},"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/1007.3743"}}