{"arxiv_id":"1007.3746","incoming":{"papers":12,"sentences":13,"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses its method or tool","papers":2,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1203.6823","title":"The XENON100 exclusion limit without considering Leff as a nuisance parameter","url":"/paper/1203.6823","section":"$L_eff$ interpolation","sentence":"The best-fit cubic spline is found by freely varying the y-axis positions of these knots, while minimising the least-squares $χ^2$ goodness-of-fit parameter between the interpolated spline and the data (see [ref] for a good discussion of the methodology).","intent_p":0.84,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1405.0495","title":"Quantifying the evidence for Dark Matter in CoGeNT data","url":"/paper/1405.0495","section":"Fitting the bulk fraction","sentence":"This is similar to the method used by the XENON100 collaboration to parameterise the functional form of the relative scintillation efficiency L$_eff$ [ref] .","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"supports_this_paper","label":"Cites it as support","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1203.6823","title":"The XENON100 exclusion limit without considering Leff as a nuisance parameter","url":"/paper/1203.6823","section":"$L_eff$ extrapolation","sentence":"Such an energy behaviour would be supported by [ref] where it is argued that the drop in the scintillation efficiency observed by [ref] could be due to the drop in sensitivity in the experiment.","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":2,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1107.0717","title":"A CoGeNT Modulation Analysis","url":"/paper/1107.0717","section":"Model-Independent Comparisons","sentence":"Whether such small values of L$_eff$ are possible or not is still a subject of active discussion in the literature [ref]","intent_p":0.9,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1006.0972","title":"XENON10/100 dark matter constraints in comparison with CoGeNT and DAMA: examining the Leff dependence","url":"/paper/1006.0972","section":"ZEPLIN-III models","sentence":"See Ref. [ref] for a discussion of the various potential issues which may affect the determinations in these experiments.","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":8},"outgoing":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"claims":[{"relation":"contradicts","label":"States a conflicting result","papers":[{"arxiv_id":"1011.3990","url":"/paper/1011.3990","title":"Interplay between scintillation and ionization in liquid xenon Dark Matter searches","main_claim":"We conclude that the relative scintillation efficiency should not decrease at low nuclear recoil energies, which has important consequences for the robustness of exclusion limits for low WIMP masses in liquid xenon Dark Matter searches.","p":0.98},{"arxiv_id":"physics/0512136","url":"/paper/physics/0512136","title":"Scintillation efficiency of liquid xenon for nuclear recoils with the energy down to 5 keV","main_claim":"The scintillation efficiency of liquid xenon for nuclear recoils has been measured to be nearly constant in the recoil energy range from 140 keV down to 5 keV.","p":0.85}]}],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/1007.3746"}}