{"arxiv_id":"1011.2491","incoming":{"papers":8,"sentences":18,"groups":[{"kind":"supports_this_paper","label":"Cites it as support","papers":3,"sentences":4,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2607.14359","title":"The chemodynamical signature of coherent metal-poor inflow and enriched recycled accretion in the cool circumgalactic medium","url":"/paper/2607.14359","section":"Coherent inflow along the disk plane","sentence":"Taken together, the combination of lower metallicity, higher density, and reduced non-thermal motions is consistent with metal-poor, filamentary inflow that retains substantial angular momentum as it spirals toward the disk [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1101.5397","title":"Rapidly Star-forming Galaxies At High Redshifts","url":"/paper/1101.5397","section":"Gas Fueling","sentence":"Simulations confirm this, and have shown that it is largely insensitive to feedback processes ( [ref] ).","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1107.5059","title":"The ATLAS3D Project-- VIII: Modelling the Formation and Evolution of Fast and Slow Rotator Early-Type Galaxies within $\\Lambda$CDM","url":"/paper/1107.5059","section":"Discussion & Summary","sentence":"SPH simulations show that feedback plays indeed a key role in regulating gas accretion rates and star formation [ref] .","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":14},"outgoing":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":{"arxiv_id":"1011.2491","kind":"model","paper_version":2,"prompt_version":"held-up-v3.5","generated_at":"2026-10-27T16:39:55+00:00","loaded_at":"2026-10-28T01:02:46.369989+00:00","evidence":"substantial","account":[],"groups":[{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with it","papers":1,"entries":[{"p":0.99,"quote":{"text":"While our galaxies are again slightly biased towards lower at high $z$ compared to [ref] , the disagreement is quite significant compared to [ref] .","citing":"2501.19009","section":"Cold fractions at final redshifts"},"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2025,"title":"Gas accretion at high redshift: cold flows all the way","arxiv_id":"2501.19009"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Reported that its own galaxies are again slightly biased towards lower values at high z compared to this paper."}],"papers_all":7,"self_papers":0,"self_entries":[]}],"counts":{"by_kind":{"contests":1,"data_used":1,"comparison":7,"supports_this_paper":11},"dropped":{"relied_on":0,"unknown_ids":0,"account_lines":0,"contest_vetoed":0,"below_threshold":0,"contest_drawback":0,"contest_without_basis":0,"contest_not_one_sentence":0,"contest_on_group_citation":0},"papers_read":11,"self_papers":9,"citing_papers":108,"sentences_read":15,"citing_sentences":186,"unambiguous_read":15,"typed_independent":16,"independent_papers":99,"by_kind_independent":{"contests":1,"data_used":1,"comparison":6,"supports_this_paper":10}},"input_sha256":"d7e86531a95344da1571fa8f7d8ae43697283f4574a1b63166b76bf217dc02ae","method":"For a paper with five or more citing arXiv papers, Pith selected up to 40 citing sentences its citation classifier typed, read those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote one paraphrase for each later paper in each group, each resting on one sentence. A later paper is listed under a label only when the classifier gives one of its sentences that label at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading of the sentence finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check of the paraphrase against the sentence passes. The section lists uses only: building on the paper, using its method, tool, data or values, comparing with it and citing it as support. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence says nothing about how the paper has been received. Code counted the papers, wrote the summary from the listed entries, set the evidence level and linked each entry to its citing paper. Quotes are copied from the citing sentence and shown only when the citing paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0; otherwise the paraphrase is shown. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart. A paper with fewer citing papers gets a line counted by code, which names uses only: a later paper whose only label is a contest is counted as not described.","line":null,"summary":"1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 compared its own results with it."},"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/1011.2491"}}