{"arxiv_id":"1201.3926","incoming":{"papers":37,"sentences":46,"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":3,"sentences":3,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1209.4872","title":"Forward Tevatron Tops and Backward LHC Tops with Associates","url":"/paper/1209.4872","section":"Introduction","sentence":"The NLO QCD predictions, including leading electroweak (EW) contributions [ref] , are [ref] A^SM_FB = 0.088 ±0.006 , when using the LO total cross section in the denominator of the asymmetry.","intent_p":0.85,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1212.4003","title":"Data driving the top quark forward--backward asymmetry with a lepton-based handle","url":"/paper/1212.4003","section":"Introduction","sentence":"For the $m_$ dependence, CDF [ref] finds, after unfolding: [equation] The asymmetry in the high-$m_$ bin is particularly striking given that the SM prediction, including EW corrections [ref] , is much lower: ()^SM ≡ 0.129^+0.008_-0.006 .","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1201.6510","title":"Probing the SM with Dijets at the LHC","url":"/paper/1201.6510","section":"Bounds","sentence":"Finally, it has been recently shown in [ref] that electroweak corrections reduce the SM prediction of $F_χ$ by a $∼2 %$ for large invariant masses $m_jj ∼2$.","intent_p":0.89,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":11,"sentences":11,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1606.01915","title":"The impact of the photon PDF and electroweak corrections on $t \\bar t$ distributions","url":"/paper/1606.01915","section":"Introduction","sentence":"While weak [ref] , QED [ref] and EW (weak+QED) [ref] corrections to $$ production at hadron colliders have been known for quite some time and the effect of Sudakov logarithms has been quantified and studied, the impact of photon-induced subprocesses has been addressed only in [ref] for only the $gγ$ channel at LO and using the only PDF set with the photon distribution available at that time, i.e., MRST­2004­QED [ref] .","intent_p":0.93,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1411.3007","title":"Resolving the Tevatron Top Quark Forward-Backward Asymmetry Puzzle: Fully Differential Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order Calculation","url":"/paper/1411.3007","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Indeed, the $$-related publications by the CDF [ref] and DØ [ref] collaborations have initiated major research activity both in explaining the discrepancy with beyond the Standard Model (BSM) physics (see e.g. Refs. [ref] ) and in estimating $$ within the Standard Model [ref] (see Ref. [ref] for an in-depth review).","intent_p":0.82,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2411.00055","title":"Progress in top-quark pair production cross section calculations and impact on parton distribution functions of the proton","url":"/paper/2411.00055","section":"Top-quark cross sections and distributions at aN$^3$LO","sentence":"Theory predictions for top-quark cross sections and differential distributions in $tt̅$ production have been computed at NLO $O(α_s^3)$ in Refs. [ref] , and NNLO at $O(α_s^4)$ in Refs. [ref] in QCD, while EW corrections to this process were studied in Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1705.04105","title":"Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW","url":"/paper/1705.04105","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Weak [ref] , QED [ref] and EW (weak+QED) [ref] corrections to top-quark pair production have been known for quite some time, and also EW corrections to the fully off-shell dilepton signature are nowadays available [ref] .","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2110.03714","title":"One-loop electroweak Sudakov logarithms: a revisitation and automation","url":"/paper/2110.03714","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Moreover, their resummation has also been studied [ref] and in Refs. [ref] a general method to resum such logarithms for an arbitrary process was developed, based on the framework of soft-collinear effective theory (SCET) [ref] .","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":32},"outgoing":{"papers":6,"sentences":13,"groups":[{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with","papers":1,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1109.6830","title":"Charge asymmetries of top quarks at hadron colliders revisited","url":"/paper/1109.6830","section":"Introduction","sentence":"We find $A_FB^t t̅ = 7.4 %$ and $A_FB^t t̅(m_tt̅<450) = 5.3 %$, $A_FB^tt̅(m_tt̅>450) = 10.7 %$ for the purely QCD asymmetry, in good agreement with other determinations [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":11},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/1201.3926"}}