{"arxiv_id":"1303.3879","incoming":{"papers":100,"sentences":141,"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses its method or tool","papers":2,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1809.10733","title":"Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV","url":"/paper/1809.10733","section":"Generic model within kappa-framework assuming resolved loops","sentence":"An additional fit is performed using a phenomenological parametrization relating the masses of the fermions and vector bosons to the corresponding $κ$ modifiers using two parameters, denoted $M$ and $ϵ$ [ref] .","intent_p":0.91,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1305.3854","title":"Bounding the Higgs Boson Width Through Interferometry","url":"/paper/1305.3854","section":"Theoretical Description","sentence":"[ref] for the effective Lagrangian,","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":24,"sentences":29,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2006.01164","title":"Probing the Higgs boson through Yukawa force","url":"/paper/2006.01164","section":"Introduction","sentence":"The Run 2 data [ref] with improved measurements of the $hbb̅$ and $htt̅$ couplings, compared to what Run 1 could achieve [ref] , penetrate rather deep into the BSM parameter space, leading to new constraints.","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1305.1016","title":"Constraining minimal and non-minimal UED models with Higgs couplings","url":"/paper/1305.1016","section":"Introduction","sentence":"We are going to use the numerical values quoted in [ref] : $√(C_gg) =0.88 ±0.11$ and $√(C_γγ) = 1.18 ±0.12.$","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1406.1993","title":"Dark Photon as Fractional Cosmic Neutrino Masquerader","url":"/paper/1406.1993","section":"Collider Bounds From Higgs Invisible Width","sentence":"The non-standard decay branching ratio of the SM Higgs boson is constrained to $Γ_h →inv < 1.2 MeV$ (branching ratio about $22%$) by the results of a global fitting to the most updated data from the CMS and ATLAS experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), as well as those from the Tevatron [ref] .","intent_p":0.91,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1404.1400","title":"The Poker Face of the Majoron Dark Matter Model: LUX to keV Line","url":"/paper/1404.1400","section":"Abundance, Direct and Indirect Detection and Higgs Bounds","sentence":"The current limit on the branching ration into invisible particles is around $10-15%$ [ref] .","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1312.5736","title":"Disentangling Higgs-Top Couplings in Associated Production","url":"/paper/1312.5736","section":"Indirect Constraints on Top-Higgs Couplings","sentence":"We display in Fig. [ref] the regions of the $(κ_t, κ̃_t)$ plane that are allowed at the 68, and 95% CL according to the analysis of [ref] .","intent_p":0.89,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with it","papers":4,"sentences":4,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1309.5410","title":"Higgs boson signal at complete tree level in the SM extension by dimension-six operators","url":"/paper/1309.5410","section":"Beyond the infinitely small width approximation","sentence":"These modifications are in a qualitative agreement with the global combination from [ref] which is based on Moriond 2013 (La Thuile, March 2013) experimental data [ref] .","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1307.3948","title":"Implications of LHC data on 125GeV Higgs-like boson for the Standard Model and its various extensions","url":"/paper/1307.3948","section":"How likely are signals universally modified? : ${ α, BR_nonSM }$","sentence":"Thus, $BR_nonSM ≤18.8%$ at 95%C.L. if $c_α1̄$ fixed as also similarly obtained by Ref. [ref] using up-to-date data.","intent_p":0.84,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1303.6591","title":"The couplings of the Higgs boson and its CP properties from fits of the signal strengths and their ratios at the 7+8 TeV LHC","url":"/paper/1303.6591","section":"5. The invisible Higgs decay width","sentence":"With the simplifying $c_f=c_V=1$ assumption, the indirect limit on the invisible width that one obtains from the signal strengths is better, as can be seen from the figure; at $1σ$, it reads as μ_inv = Γ_H^inv/ Γ_H^SM ≤0.52 @68%CL This limit is at least a factor of two worse than those obtained in the similar fits of Refs. [ref] using the latest LHC data, the reason being that, here, we assume a 20% theoretical uncertainty on the Higgs production cross sections that we treat as a bias and do not combine quadratically with the experimental uncertainty.","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1311.7260","title":"Displaced vertices and long-lived charged particles in the NMSSM with right-handed sneutrinos","url":"/paper/1311.7260","section":"Constraints on the Higgs invisible decay width","sentence":"With this prescription, we obtain $(h_SM^0→inv)<0.15(0.27)$ at $1σ(2σ)$, consistent with other recent analyses [ref] .","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":13,"sentences":13,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1504.04308","title":"Status of MSSM Higgs Sector using Global Analysis and Direct Search Bounds, and Future Prospects at the HL-LHC","url":"/paper/1504.04308","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Soon after the discovery of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, several analyses have been performed, for example, in the context of MSSM [ref] , general 2-Higgs doublet models [ref] , next-to minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM) [ref] , effective theory framework [ref] .","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1306.2941","title":"Global fit to Higgs signal strengths and couplings and implications for extended Higgs sectors","url":"/paper/1306.2941","section":"Introduction","sentence":"The Higgs couplings can be parametrized in terms of effective Lagrangians [ref] whose structure depends, however, on the class of models considered, such as extended Higgs sectors, extra fermions and/or scalars contributing to loop diagrams, composite Higgs bosons and/or fermions, nonlinear realizations of electroweak symmetry breaking, large extra dimensions, Higgs–dilaton mixing and more.","intent_p":0.95,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1406.6367","title":"CP violation with a dynamical Higgs","url":"/paper/1406.6367","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Indirect searches may well give fruitful results prior to the discovery of new resonances, and may allow to explore and disentangle the two possible avenues of realisation of electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB): linear [ref] –which is typical of BSM theories in which the Higgs particle is elementary– or non-linear [ref] –as for instance in models in which the Higgs boson is a composite pseudo-goldstone boson of some strong-interacting BSM theory or a dilaton.","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1312.3324","title":"Higgs Bosons from Top Quark Decays","url":"/paper/1312.3324","section":"Type I 2HDM Constraints","sentence":"Since the Higgs boson's discovery, many reports have appeared investigating the 2HDMs' compatibility with data [ref] .","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1404.2866","title":"One-loop $\\gamma\\gamma\\to W^+_L W^-_L$ and $\\gamma\\gamma\\to Z_L Z_L$ from the Electroweak Chiral Lagrangian with a light Higgs-like scalar","url":"/paper/1404.2866","section":"Introduction","sentence":"At present the complete list of terms contributing to this ECLh at the tree level is well known, including all the operators with bosonic and fermionic fields up to chiral dimension $d=4$ [ref] , and there are several works that use the ECLh for phenomenological purposes, like those devoted to the study of deviations in the Higgs-like particle couplings to fermions and EW bosons at the tree level, and the possibility to disentangle these deviations at the LHC [ref] .","intent_p":0.86,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":93},"outgoing":{"papers":13,"sentences":17,"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses data or values from","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1207.7214","title":"Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC","url":"/paper/1207.7214","section":"Summary of the Data","sentence":"The same information can be found for ATLAS at 7 TeV in [ref] and at 8 TeV in [ref] , broken down into eleven subchannels including two VBF-dominated ones.","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites as background","papers":5,"sentences":5,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1203.3456","title":"Total Width of 125 GeV Higgs Boson","url":"/paper/1203.3456","section":"The Total Higgs Decay Rate","sentence":"We now discuss the total Higgs decay rate in the two classes of global fit discussed above, assuming that the Higgs has no other decays beyond those in the Standard Model [ref] .","intent_p":0.81,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1202.3144","title":"Interpreting LHC Higgs Results from Natural New Physics Perspective","url":"/paper/1202.3144","section":"Introduction and Summary","sentence":"There have been many analyses of the $H$ couplings [ref] , some also including the Moriond 2013 data [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1207.1693","title":"Global Analysis of the Higgs Candidate with Mass ~ 125 GeV","url":"/paper/1207.1693","section":"Introduction and Summary","sentence":"There have been many analyses of the $H$ couplings [ref] , some also including the Moriond 2013 data [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1303.3570","title":"The universal Higgs fit","url":"/paper/1303.3570","section":"Introduction and Summary","sentence":"There have been many analyses of the $H$ couplings [ref] , some also including the Moriond 2013 data [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1205.6790","title":"Probing for Invisible Higgs Decays with Global Fits","url":"/paper/1205.6790","section":"The Total Higgs Decay Rate","sentence":"One may also use the current Higgs measurements to constrain the branching ratio for Higgs decays into invisible particles, $BR_inv$ [ref] .","intent_p":0.85,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":11},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":{"arxiv_id":"1303.3879","kind":"model","paper_version":1,"prompt_version":"held-up-v3.5","generated_at":"2026-10-27T17:00:59+00:00","loaded_at":"2026-10-28T01:02:52.202718+00:00","evidence":"substantial","account":[],"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":3,"entries":[{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2013,"title":"Constraining minimal and non-minimal UED models with Higgs couplings","arxiv_id":"1305.1016"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Used the numerical values quoted in this paper, √(C_gg) = 0.88 ± 0.11 and √(C_γγ) = 1.18 ± 0.12."},{"p":0.93,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2016,"title":"Phenomenology of the Sterile Neutrinos","arxiv_id":"1605.09680"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Took the LHC 8 TeV data bound of BR(H→invisible) < 0.13 at 95% CL from this paper."}],"papers_all":24,"self_papers":1,"self_entries":[{"p":0.89,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":true,"year":2013,"title":"Disentangling Higgs-Top Couplings in Associated Production","arxiv_id":"1312.5736"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Displayed the regions of the (κ_t, κ̃_t) plane allowed at the 68 and 95% CL according to the analysis of this paper."}]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with it","papers":1,"entries":[{"p":0.99,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2013,"title":"The couplings of the Higgs boson and its CP properties from fits of the signal strengths and their ratios at the 7+8 TeV LHC","arxiv_id":"1303.6591"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Reported that its indirect limit on the invisible width is at least a factor of two worse than those obtained in the similar fits of this paper using the latest LHC data."}],"papers_all":4,"self_papers":0,"self_entries":[]}],"counts":{"by_kind":{"data_used":24,"comparison":4,"method_or_tool":2},"dropped":{"relied_on":0,"unknown_ids":0,"account_lines":0,"contest_vetoed":0,"below_threshold":0,"contest_drawback":0,"contest_without_basis":0,"contest_not_one_sentence":0,"contest_on_group_citation":0},"papers_read":9,"self_papers":10,"citing_papers":101,"sentences_read":14,"citing_sentences":142,"unambiguous_read":14,"typed_independent":27,"independent_papers":91,"by_kind_independent":{"data_used":21,"comparison":4,"method_or_tool":2}},"input_sha256":"b442b0db93bbc61eae622a09387f09305665085c5242f90bc042304085e8e74a","method":"For a paper with five or more citing arXiv papers, Pith selected up to 40 citing sentences its citation classifier typed, read those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote one paraphrase for each later paper in each group, each resting on one sentence. A later paper is listed under a label only when the classifier gives one of its sentences that label at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading of the sentence finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check of the paraphrase against the sentence passes. The section lists uses only: building on the paper, using its method, tool, data or values, comparing with it and citing it as support. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence says nothing about how the paper has been received. Code counted the papers, wrote the summary from the listed entries, set the evidence level and linked each entry to its citing paper. Quotes are copied from the citing sentence and shown only when the citing paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0; otherwise the paraphrase is shown. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart. A paper with fewer citing papers gets a line counted by code, which names uses only: a later paper whose only label is a contest is counted as not described.","line":null,"summary":"3 later papers by other authors are listed below: 2 used its data or values and 1 compared its own results with it. 1 more paper by the same authors is listed: 1 used its data or values."},"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/1303.3879"}}