{"arxiv_id":"1902.08235","incoming":{"papers":1,"sentences":1,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":1},"outgoing":{"papers":24,"sentences":35,"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses the method or tool of","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1303.6324","title":"Lepton number and flavour violation in TeV-scale left-right symmetric theories with large left-right mixing","url":"/paper/1303.6324","section":"Lepton flavour violation and heavy neutrino constraints","sentence":"The branching ratio for these processes can be written as [ref] BR(l_i →l_j γ) = 3 α_em/2 π(|(G_L^γ)_ij|^2+|(G_R^γ)_ij|^2) , where $G_L^γ$ and $G_R^γ$ are explicitly given in the Appendix [ref].","intent_p":0.86,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses data or values from","papers":2,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1605.05081","title":"Search for the Lepton Flavour Violating Decay $\\mu^{+} \\to e^+ \\gamma$ with the Full Dataset of the MEG Experiment","url":"/paper/1605.05081","section":"Lepton flavour violation and heavy neutrino constraints","sentence":"Among the possible decays, the constraint on the muon decay is the strongest one with $BR(μ^+→e^+ γ) < 4.2×10^-13$ [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0908.2381","title":"Searches for Lepton Flavor Violation in the Decays tau -> e gamma and tau -> mu gamma","url":"/paper/0908.2381","section":"Lepton flavour violation and heavy neutrino constraints","sentence":"Whereas the current upper limits for the branching ratio associated with tau decays, i.e. $τ→μγ$ and $τ→e γ$, are of order of $10^-8$ [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with","papers":2,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1804.01598","title":"Natural Alignment of Quark Flavors and Radiatively Induced Quark Mixings","url":"/paper/1804.01598","section":"Lepton masses: inverse seesaw mechanism","sentence":"[ref] , where the type-I seesaw mechanism is realised and the authors argue that only for values of $v_R≥50$ TeV can the current neutrino data be fitted.","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0909.1754","title":"Asymmetric Higgs Sector and Neutrino Mass in an SU(2)_R Model","url":"/paper/0909.1754","section":"The scalar sector","sentence":"[ref] , the authors avoid such an issue by assuming an asymmetric LR model in which $η_L$ is absent, in ref.","intent_p":0.92,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites as background","papers":4,"sentences":4,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1208.3654","title":"Higgs Decays in the Low Scale Type I See-Saw Model","url":"/paper/1208.3654","section":"Lepton flavour violation and heavy neutrino constraints","sentence":"For discussions on this topic, see, for example, Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.89,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1704.00880","title":"Constraining Sterile Neutrinos from Precision Higgs Data","url":"/paper/1704.00880","section":"Lepton flavour violation and heavy neutrino constraints","sentence":"For discussions on this topic, see, for example, Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.89,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1207.2756","title":"Bounds on TeV Seesaw Models from LHC Higgs Data","url":"/paper/1207.2756","section":"Lepton flavour violation and heavy neutrino constraints","sentence":"For discussions on this topic, see, for example, Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.89,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1306.4669","title":"Complex Spinors and Unified Theories","url":"/paper/1306.4669","section":"Introduction","sentence":"As a result of the imposition of such symmetries, three generations of right-handed neutrinos are necessarily introduced allowing, in principle, for the implementation of the (type-I) seesaw mechanism for neutrino mass generation [ref] .","intent_p":0.82,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":26},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/1902.08235"}}