{"arxiv_id":"2003.01119","incoming":{"papers":35,"sentences":84,"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":3,"sentences":6,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2110.14652","title":"Evidence from Disrupted Halo Dwarfs that $r$-process Enrichment via Neutron Star Mergers is Delayed by $\\gtrsim500$ Myrs","url":"/paper/2110.14652","section":"Mass & star-formation duration","sentence":"As our fiducial value we adopt 2 Gyr based on [ref] who used all available information on the Kraken GCs (age, metallicity, dynamics) to infer $≈1.7$ Gyrs as the difference between GSE and Kraken's accretion epochs.","intent_p":0.9,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2005.02401","title":"The kinematics of globular cluster populations in the E-MOSAICS simulations and their implications for the assembly history of the Milky Way","url":"/paper/2005.02401","section":"Comparison with constraints on the assembly history of the MW and $L^*$ galaxies","sentence":"A total of $∼55$ known accreted GCs can be associated to the 5 known GC-bearing accretion events [ref] .","intent_p":0.92,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2007.10374","title":"Evidence from APOGEE for the presence of a major building block of the halo buried in the inner Galaxy","url":"/paper/2007.10374","section":"The Properties of the IGS Progenitor","sentence":"Finally, [ref] estimate the stellar mass of the Kraken to be $∼2×10^8 M_⊙$, or approximately 70% of the mass of GE/S.","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with it","papers":5,"sentences":11,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2204.09057","title":"Live Fast, Die $\\alpha$-Enhanced: The Mass-Metallicity-$\\alpha$ Relation of the Milky Way's Disrupted Dwarf Galaxies","url":"/paper/2204.09057","section":"Disrupted galaxy sample","sentence":"As a sanity check, based on this method, Sgr would have an inferred stellar mass of $≈3×10^8 M_⊙$, which is in excellent agreement with various literature estimates that span $≈2-6 ×10^8 M_⊙$ [ref] , and within a factor of 2 of our adopted value ($6×10^8 M_⊙$) from [ref] .","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2006.08625","title":"Evidence from the H3 Survey that the Stellar Halo is Entirely Comprised of Substructure","url":"/paper/2006.08625","section":"Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus (GSE)","sentence":"This is in excellent agreement with recent estimates from GSE's GC age-metallicity relation ($≈2-4×10^8 M_⊙$, [ref] ), star counts of [Fe/H]$<-1$, $e>0.7$ APOGEE red giants ($≈2-5×10^8 M_⊙$, [ref] ), and the integrated SFR of a chemical evolution model ($≈6×10^8 M_⊙$, [ref] ).","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2111.01669","title":"Age Determination of Galaxy Merger Remnant Stars using Asteroseismology","url":"/paper/2111.01669","section":"Conclusion","sentence":"It is possible that four of these stars belong to the dwarf galaxy Kraken and their mean ages are estimated to be $9.2_-1.7^+1.9$ Gyr in agreement with estimates from [ref] .","intent_p":0.89,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2007.10374","title":"Evidence from APOGEE for the presence of a major building block of the halo buried in the inner Galaxy","url":"/paper/2007.10374","section":"The Properties of the IGS Progenitor","sentence":"Indeed, both the orbital properties and time of accretion of the progenitor of the IGS agree with the predictions by [ref] for the Kraken accretion event.","intent_p":0.8,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2005.02401","title":"The kinematics of globular cluster populations in the E-MOSAICS simulations and their implications for the assembly history of the Milky Way","url":"/paper/2005.02401","section":"Comparison with constraints on the assembly history of the MW and $L^*$ galaxies","sentence":"This agrees with several studies which obtain a lower limit of $z∼2$ [ref] , as well as with the more stringent limit from the GC age-metallicity relation, $z4$ [ref] .","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"supports_this_paper","label":"Cites it as support","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2006.08625","title":"Evidence from the H3 Survey that the Stellar Halo is Entirely Comprised of Substructure","url":"/paper/2006.08625","section":"The Ex-Situ Halo","sentence":"Post Gaia-DR2 almost all halo GCs (those at high-energy, that are not on disk-like orbits) have been associated with phase-space structures seen in stars, strongly suggesting they were accreted along with some dwarf Galaxy [ref] .","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":4,"sentences":5,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2007.14408","title":"A Diffuse Metal-Poor Component of the Sagittarius Stream Revealed by the H3 Survey","url":"/paper/2007.14408","section":"Sagittarius Globular Clusters","sentence":"Recently it has become clear that many, if not most of the GCs are associated with accreted galaxies in the halo [ref] .","intent_p":0.86,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2111.01669","title":"Age Determination of Galaxy Merger Remnant Stars using Asteroseismology","url":"/paper/2111.01669","section":"Ex-situ","sentence":"There are several studies denoting stars and globular clusters to galaxy remnants such as [ref] .","intent_p":0.82,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2204.01794","title":"Observing EAGLE galaxies with JWST: predictions for Milky Way progenitors and their building blocks","url":"/paper/2204.01794","section":"Introduction","sentence":"There are several other suggested merger events present in the MW's history, these events tend to be either lower in stellar mass or at higher redshifts and are not very well characterised [ref] .","intent_p":0.8,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2009.09611","title":"Absolute V-band magnitudes and mass-to-light ratios of Galactic globular clusters","url":"/paper/2009.09611","section":"INTRODUCTION","sentence":"In addition, past merger episodes of galaxies can be deduced from their globular cluster populations [ref] .","intent_p":0.82,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":61},"outgoing":{"papers":9,"sentences":37,"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses data or values from","papers":1,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1906.08271","title":"Origin of the system of globular clusters in the Milky Way","url":"/paper/1906.08271","section":"Introduction","sentence":"In this paper, we use the groups of GCs identified by [ref] as having been accreted from the same satellite progenitors to determine the masses and accretion redshifts of these five galaxies.","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with","papers":2,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1802.03414","title":"Co-formation of the Galactic disc and the stellar halo","url":"/paper/1802.03414","section":"Accretion redshifts","sentence":"[ref] estimate that was accreted $∼10$ ago, whereas [ref] estimate a range of $8-11$ ago, and [ref] provide an upper limit on the accretion redshift of $<1.5$ (or $<9.5$).","intent_p":0.95,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1910.09552","title":"Empirical constraints on the formation of early-type galaxies","url":"/paper/1910.09552","section":"Satellite accretion history and in-situ growth","sentence":"The remaining 10 satellites are expected to have masses below $∼10^8$ (or otherwise they would have contributed $5$ GCs, which would plausibly have been identified), implying that the total accreted stellar mass is likely to be close to the sum of the five satellites discussed here (which is on the low side of, but consistent with the predictions for Milky Way-mass galaxies by [ref] and [ref] , who find $1-5×10^9$).","intent_p":0.95,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":33},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":{"arxiv_id":"2003.01119","kind":"model","paper_version":1,"prompt_version":"held-up-v3.5","generated_at":"2026-10-27T15:11:10+00:00","loaded_at":"2026-10-28T01:02:22.509634+00:00","evidence":"substantial","account":[],"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":3,"entries":[{"p":0.8,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2021,"title":"Globular cluster candidates in the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy","arxiv_id":"2109.06731"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Used the ages of the eight members selected by another work and this paper, which provided consistent evidence for considering them purely associated to Sagittarius."}],"papers_all":16,"self_papers":2,"self_entries":[{"p":0.98,"quote":{"text":"For the true origin labels we use the classification by [ref] (as revised by [ref] for Pal 1 and NGC 6441) based on the GC ages, metallicities, and orbits.","citing":"2301.05716","section":"Testing the model on the Milky Way GCs"},"citing":[{"self":true,"year":2023,"title":"In-situ or accreted? Using deep learning to infer the origin of extragalactic globular clusters from observables","arxiv_id":"2301.05716"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Used the classification by another work, as revised by this paper for Pal 1 and NGC 6441, as the true origin labels."},{"p":0.9,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":true,"year":2021,"title":"Evidence from Disrupted Halo Dwarfs that $r$-process Enrichment via Neutron Star Mergers is Delayed by $\\gtrsim500$ Myrs","arxiv_id":"2110.14652"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Adopted 2 Gyr as its fiducial value based on this paper, which used all available information on the Kraken GCs to infer about 1.7 Gyrs as the difference between GSE and Kraken's accretion epochs."}]}],"counts":{"by_kind":{"extends":1,"data_used":16,"comparison":15,"method_or_tool":1,"supports_this_paper":6},"dropped":{"relied_on":0,"unknown_ids":0,"account_lines":0,"contest_vetoed":0,"below_threshold":0,"contest_drawback":0,"contest_without_basis":0,"contest_not_one_sentence":0,"contest_on_group_citation":0},"papers_read":12,"self_papers":35,"citing_papers":151,"sentences_read":17,"citing_sentences":297,"unambiguous_read":17,"typed_independent":21,"independent_papers":116,"by_kind_independent":{"data_used":12,"comparison":7,"method_or_tool":1,"supports_this_paper":3}},"input_sha256":"cf12fa9287fd1ff118e5ffc99681b3bd475804b316fe954273a006c99ca41815","method":"For a paper with five or more citing arXiv papers, Pith selected up to 40 citing sentences its citation classifier typed, read those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote one paraphrase for each later paper in each group, each resting on one sentence. A later paper is listed under a label only when the classifier gives one of its sentences that label at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading of the sentence finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check of the paraphrase against the sentence passes. The section lists uses only: building on the paper, using its method, tool, data or values, comparing with it and citing it as support. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence says nothing about how the paper has been received. Code counted the papers, wrote the summary from the listed entries, set the evidence level and linked each entry to its citing paper. Quotes are copied from the citing sentence and shown only when the citing paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0; otherwise the paraphrase is shown. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart. A paper with fewer citing papers gets a line counted by code, which names uses only: a later paper whose only label is a contest is counted as not described.","line":null,"summary":"1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 used its data or values. 2 more papers by the same authors are listed: 2 used its data or values."},"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/2003.01119"}}