{"arxiv_id":"2204.05296","incoming":{"papers":59,"sentences":72,"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses its method or tool","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2212.09253","title":"Accommodating the CDF W-boson Mass Measurement in the Beautiful Mirror Model","url":"/paper/2212.09253","section":"Electroweak global fit","sentence":"Our analysis mainly follows Refs. [ref] , and is a slightly simplified version of the ones in Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2205.00031","title":"Physics at Future Colliders: the Interplay Between Energy and Luminosity","url":"/paper/2205.00031","section":"Lepton colliders: sub-TeV case","sentence":"The recent result reported by the CDF collaboration improve the precision to $δm_W =9.4$ MeV [ref] (with an intriguing deviation from the SM electroweak fit and other collider measurements [ref] ).","intent_p":0.92,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with it","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2208.06760","title":"Electroweak precision tests for triplet scalars","url":"/paper/2208.06760","section":"Electroweak global fits","sentence":"Our results are consistent within $1σ$ with Ref. [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"supports_this_paper","label":"Cites it as support","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2204.10338","title":"Status of the two-Higgs-doublet model in light of the CDF $m_W$ measurement","url":"/paper/2204.10338","section":"Introduction","sentence":"According to Ref. [ref] , it is hard to explain $m^CDF_W$ without going beyond the SM.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":34,"sentences":35,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2204.11570","title":"Corrections to electroweak precision observables from mixings of an exotic vector boson in light of the CDF $W$-mass anomaly","url":"/paper/2204.11570","section":"Introduction","sentence":"The EW global fits with the CDF $m_W$ data considered have been performed in Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.85,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2307.13045","title":"Precision Electroweak Tensions and a Dark Photon","url":"/paper/2307.13045","section":"Introduction","sentence":"For recent work on PEW fits in light of the new CDF $W$ mass measurement as well as applications to the dark photon model see Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.88,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2209.11421","title":"Constraints from New CDF II W-Boson Mass On Top-Bottom Seesaw and the TopFlavor Models","url":"/paper/2209.11421","section":"Introduction","sentence":"There have been many attempts to resolve the W mass anomaly, see e.g. [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2205.01701","title":"CDF $W$ boson mass and muon $g-2$ in type-X two-Higgs-doublet model with a Higgs-phobic light pseudoscalar","url":"/paper/2205.01701","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Various BSM models have been studied to explain the new oblique parameters [ref] .","intent_p":0.93,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2212.09253","title":"Accommodating the CDF W-boson Mass Measurement in the Beautiful Mirror Model","url":"/paper/2212.09253","section":"Introduction","sentence":"The possible new physics explanations of this discrepancy have been extensively studied afterwards [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":33},"outgoing":{"papers":47,"sentences":61,"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses the method or tool of","papers":10,"sentences":11,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1803.03252","title":"Updated Global SMEFT Fit to Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Data","url":"/paper/1803.03252","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"The SMEFT parameterization in our analysis follow closely the ones in Refs. [ref] (see also Refs. [ref] ), where the contributions to observables from the dimension-6 operators are calculated at the tree-level, but normalized to the SM predictions.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2007.01296","title":"Putting SMEFT Fits to Work","url":"/paper/2007.01296","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"The SMEFT parameterization in our analysis follow closely the ones in Refs. [ref] (see also Refs. [ref] ), where the contributions to observables from the dimension-6 operators are calculated at the tree-level, but normalized to the SM predictions.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2105.00006","title":"Combined SMEFT interpretation of Higgs, diboson, and top quark data from the LHC","url":"/paper/2105.00006","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"The SMEFT parameterization in our analysis follow closely the ones in Refs. [ref] (see also Refs. [ref] ), where the contributions to observables from the dimension-6 operators are calculated at the tree-level, but normalized to the SM predictions.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2012.02779","title":"Top, Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Fit to the Standard Model Effective Field Theory","url":"/paper/2012.02779","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"The SMEFT parameterization in our analysis follow closely the ones in Refs. [ref] (see also Refs. [ref] ), where the contributions to observables from the dimension-6 operators are calculated at the tree-level, but normalized to the SM predictions.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1411.0669","title":"Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators","url":"/paper/1411.0669","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"The SMEFT parameterization in our analysis follow closely the ones in Refs. [ref] (see also Refs. [ref] ), where the contributions to observables from the dimension-6 operators are calculated at the tree-level, but normalized to the SM predictions.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses data or values from","papers":6,"sentences":7,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1407.3792","title":"The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC","url":"/paper/1407.3792","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"The SM predictions are taken from the central values of the SM-fit in Ref. [ref] , except for $m_W$, which is from Ref. [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"hep-ex/0509008","title":"Precision Electroweak Measurements on the Z Resonance","url":"/paper/hep-ex/0509008","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"For the Z-pole measurements, we use the results in Ref. [ref] , where the correlations (if available) are also included.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1808.02343","title":"Combination of the searches for pair-produced vector-like partners of the third-generation quarks at $\\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector","url":"/paper/1808.02343","section":"singlet top partner","sentence":"The direct detection of $13$ TeV LHC on singlet top partner excludes the mass region $m_T <1.31$ TeV [ref] , which corresponds to the black region in <ref>.","intent_p":0.91,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1302.3415","title":"Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP","url":"/paper/1302.3415","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"The measurements of W branching ratios are taken from Ref. [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/9602414","title":"Phase Transitions and Vacuum Tunneling Into Charge and Color Breaking Minima in the MSSM","url":"/paper/hep-ph/9602414","section":"Non-degenerate Top-squark soft masses","sentence":"Here in <ref>, we use orange dashed curve to represent empirical constraint from Ref. [ref] , A_t^2+3μ^2 < 7.5 (m_Q_3^2+m_U_3^2).","intent_p":0.91,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with","papers":6,"sentences":7,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1411.0669","title":"Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators","url":"/paper/1411.0669","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"As in Ref. [ref] , here the central values of $c_WB$ and $C_T$ becomes negative, and we observe very strong correlations among $c_WB$, $c_T$ and $c_He$ in the range $0.93$-$0.96$ (see <ref>), which are also strongly correlated with $c^1221_ℓℓ$.","intent_p":0.93,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1407.3792","title":"The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC","url":"/paper/1407.3792","section":"EW Fit","sentence":"Our results from this simple treatment for the $S, T$ parameters are in good agreement with the ones from Ref. [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2204.04204","title":"Impact of the recent measurements of the top-quark and W-boson masses on electroweak precision fits","url":"/paper/2204.04204","section":"Outlook","sentence":"Note added: Recent studies [ref] also performed EW global fits to the new CDF $m_W$ measurements, which are generally in good agreement with our results.","intent_p":0.9,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2204.03996","title":"Hadronic Uncertainties versus New Physics for the $W$ boson Mass and Muon $g-2$ Anomalies","url":"/paper/2204.03996","section":"Outlook","sentence":"Note added: Recent studies [ref] also performed EW global fits to the new CDF $m_W$ measurements, which are generally in good agreement with our results.","intent_p":0.9,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2204.03796","title":"Electroweak Precision Fit and New Physics in light of $W$ Boson Mass","url":"/paper/2204.03796","section":"Outlook","sentence":"Note added: Recent studies [ref] also performed EW global fits to the new CDF $m_W$ measurements, which are generally in good agreement with our results.","intent_p":0.9,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites as background","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1104.0083","title":"A Revisit to Top Quark Forward-Backward Asymmetry","url":"/paper/1104.0083","section":"case II: right-handed breaking","sentence":"And then the electroweak symmetry $SU(2)_L ×U(1)_Y$ is broken by Higgs doublet [ref] .","intent_p":0.85,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":35},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/2204.05296"}}