{"arxiv_id":"2406.08254","incoming":{"papers":1,"sentences":2,"groups":[{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with it","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2409.07916","title":"Follow-up of Neutron Star Mergers with CTA and Prospects for Joint Detection with Gravitational-Wave Detectors","url":"/paper/2409.07916","section":"Discussion and Conclusion","sentence":"Our approach to model sGRB afterglow SSC emission showcases few similarities with the proposed model of [ref] .","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2409.07916","title":"Follow-up of Neutron Star Mergers with CTA and Prospects for Joint Detection with Gravitational-Wave Detectors","url":"/paper/2409.07916","section":"Discussion and Conclusion","sentence":"While this manuscript was being prepared, [ref] also proposed a comprehensive numerical model for simulating the SSC afterglow of structured jets in BNS across the radio to very high energy, which they applied to explain high energy emission from GW 170817.","intent_p":0.92,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"outgoing":{"papers":1,"sentences":1,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":1},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/2406.08254"}}