{"arxiv_id":"2606.23398","incoming":{"papers":5,"sentences":20,"groups":[{"kind":"extends","label":"Builds on it","papers":1,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2608.24948","title":"The equality cases $P_t(\\mathbb{N})=\\tfrac12$ for the deconvolved sum-of-digits measures","url":"/paper/2608.24948","section":"Random walk on a tree and the running mass of $ℕ$","sentence":"Corollary [ref] holds true for a random walk on any binary tree - it is an analogue of Proposition 4.2 from [ref] .","intent_p":0.93,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses its method or tool","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2608.24948","title":"The equality cases $P_t(\\mathbb{N})=\\tfrac12$ for the deconvolved sum-of-digits measures","url":"/paper/2608.24948","section":"Properties of $T_w$, and the formula for $P_w()$.","sentence":"In the proof, as in [ref] , we count the words with an inserted/deleted digit.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2608.14821","title":"Proof of the TuDeng Conjecture","url":"/paper/2608.14821","section":"The Tu–Deng conjecture and its history","sentence":"Cheng later proved Cusick's conjecture by a cyclic deletion and first-exit argument [ref] .","intent_p":0.85,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":16},"outgoing":{"papers":1,"sentences":6,"groups":[{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2605.08624","title":"On the sum-of-digits measures and Cusick's conjecture via stopped random walks","url":"/paper/2605.08624","section":"The finite comb identity","sentence":"Accordingly, formula [ref] is the $0/1$-notation version of equation (4.10) in Tarłowski [ref] , and the limiting identity [ref] is the corresponding case of his Theorem 21.","intent_p":0.86,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":5},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/2606.23398"}}