{"arxiv_id":"hep-ex/0110007","incoming":{"papers":10,"sentences":14,"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":3,"sentences":3,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2403.19384","title":"Impact of JLab data on the determination of GPDs at zero skewness and new insights from transition form factors $ N\\rightarrow \\Delta $","url":"/paper/2403.19384","section":"Nucleon to $Δ$ electromagnetic transition","sentence":"In this plot, we have separated the data of CLAS (2002) [ref] , CLAS (2006) [ref] , CLAS (2009) [ref] , Hall C [ref] and Hall A [ref] from JLab as well as MAMI [ref] and Blomberg (2016) [ref] .","intent_p":0.88,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0903.1723","title":"The Nucleon Distribution Amplitudes and their application to nucleon form factors and the $N \\to \\Delta$ transition at intermediate values of $Q^2$","url":"/paper/0903.1723","section":"Results for the form factors at intermediate momentum transfer","sentence":"Finally we use the following data for the $N →Δ$ transition: * The magnetic form factor normalized to the dipole form factor $G_M^*/(3 G_D)$ from [ref] . * The ratio of the electric quadrupole to the magnetic form factor $R_EM$ from [ref] . * The ratio of the Coulomb quadrupole to the magnetic form factor $R_SM$ from [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2607.13523","title":"Weak charged current induced electron and positron scattering off proton at JLab and MAMI energies","url":"/paper/2607.13523","section":"Weak vector form factors:","sentence":"For the resonances $P_11(1440)$ and $S_11(1535)$, the values of $A_1/2$ at $Q^2=0$ are taken from the PDG [ref] , whereas the parameters $a_1$ and $b_1$ are obtained by fitting the meson electroproduction data on the cross section at various $Q^2$ as measured in the CLAS experiment [ref] .","intent_p":0.91,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with it","papers":1,"sentences":2,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2104.07312","title":"J\\\"ulich-Bonn-Washington Model for Pion Electroproduction Multipoles","url":"/paper/2104.07312","section":"Fit results","sentence":"We note that the description of the structure functions does indeed agree with the results of Refs. [ref] in nearly all cases, apart from a discrepancy in $σ_LT$ at $W=1.14$ GeV.","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":9},"outgoing":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/hep-ex/0110007"}}