{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0310204","incoming":{"papers":57,"sentences":65,"groups":[{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2310.17685","title":"Neutrino Oscillations and Mass Models","url":"/paper/2310.17685","section":"Two state atmospheric neutrino mixing","sentence":"The atmospheric data is statistically dominated by the Super-Kamiokande results and the latest reported data sample leads to (Ref [ref] ): [equation]","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":43,"sentences":49,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2404.14917","title":"Particle Swarm Optimization Based Analysis to Unlocking the Neutrino Mass Puzzle using $A_{4}\\times Z_{3}\\times Z_{10}$ Flavor Symmetry","url":"/paper/2404.14917","section":"Mass matrices of charged lepton and neutrino","sentence":"Due to the VEVs (see section [ref]), one can generate mass matrices for charged leptons ($M_l$), Dirac neutrinos ($M_D$) and right handed Majorana neutrinos as [equation] [equation] Here, seesaw frameworks, particularly type-I [ref] and type-II [ref] , used besides several other methods to explain small neutrino masses.","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2606.26676","title":"Torsional four-fermion interaction for Majorana neutrinos","url":"/paper/2606.26676","section":"Introduction","sentence":"There are several models which naturally produce very small neutrino masses, for example the SeeSaw type models [ref] or Radiative mass models [ref] that produce masses via loop corrections which are naturally small.","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2407.17247","title":"Exploring new physics with DUNE high energy flux: the case of Lorentz Invariance Violation, Large Extra Dimensions and Long Range Forces","url":"/paper/2407.17247","section":"The Large Extra Dimensions case","sentence":"These difficulties can be overcome by several BSM models [ref] ; among them, the Large Extra Dimensions (LED) theory [ref] not only provides a viable framework but also supply an explanation for the enormous difference between the Electroweak and the Planck scale [ref] .","intent_p":0.95,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1204.5986","title":"Effective Lagrangian approach to neutrinoless double beta decay and neutrino masses","url":"/paper/1204.5986","section":"LL models","sentence":"Specific models for any of the three possible see-saw scenarios [Assuming only one light SM Higgs doublet.] (see Eq. ([ref])) require very heavy mediators, with masses $∼10^14$ GeV or very small couplings, and were discussed some time ago (for recent reviews see [ref] ).","intent_p":0.91,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"2502.13002","title":"Inverse Seesaw Mechanism and Axion Portal Fermionic Dark Matter","url":"/paper/2502.13002","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Traditional seesaw mechanisms have been proposed to explain the smallness of neutrino masses by introducing heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos, which generate light neutrino masses suppressed by the heavy Majorana scale [ref] , commonly referred to as the seesaw scale.","intent_p":0.96,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":15},"outgoing":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/hep-ph/0310204"}}