{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0512272","incoming":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"outgoing":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"claims":[{"relation":"same_result","label":"States the same result","papers":[{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0502133","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0502133","title":"New Physics and Evidence for a Complex CKM","main_claim":"It is shown that even if one allows for New Physics a real CKM matrix is excluded at a 99.92% C.L., and the probability for the phase $\\gamma$ to be in the interval $[-170^\\circ;-10^\\circ]\\cup [10^\\circ;170^\\circ]$ is 99.7%.","p":0.99}]},{"relation":"contradicts","label":"States a conflicting result","papers":[{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/9904379","url":"/paper/hep-ph/9904379","title":"A Real CKM Matrix and Physics Beyond the Standard Model","main_claim":"We show that present experimental data allow for a real CKM matrix provided that new physics also contributes to Delta m_{B_d} by at least 20% of the SM contribution (for rho > 0), besides generating CP violation in the kaon sector.","p":0.92}]}],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/hep-ph/0512272"}}