{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0512279","incoming":{"papers":3,"sentences":5,"groups":[{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"0711.3522","title":"Hadronic atoms in QCD + QED","url":"/paper/0711.3522","section":"Analysis of the DEAR data","sentence":"For a further discussion on this issue, we refer to Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.84,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":4},"outgoing":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"claims":[{"relation":"contradicts","label":"States a conflicting result","papers":[{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0508081","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0508081","title":"Surprises in threshold antikaon-nucleon physics","main_claim":"We typically find two classes of solutions, both of them reproducing previous data, that either can or cannot accommodate the DEAR measurements.","p":0.99},{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0601109","url":"/paper/hep-ph/0601109","title":"Reply to Comment on \"Surprises in threshold antikaon-nucleon physics\"","main_claim":"We discuss why their arguments are irrelevant or do not hold.","p":0.86}]}],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/hep-ph/0512279"}}