{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0602028","incoming":{"papers":73,"sentences":127,"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses its method or tool","papers":28,"sentences":35,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"1111.6098","title":"Bayesian Implications of Current LHC and XENON100 Search Limits for the Constrained MSSM","url":"/paper/1111.6098","section":"The statistical framework","sentence":"We use our updated and modified version of the [ref] computer program to perform four scans of the CMSSM:","intent_p":0.98,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1206.0264","title":"Constrained MSSM favoring new territories: The impact of new LHC limits and a 125 GeV Higgs boson","url":"/paper/1206.0264","section":"The framework","sentence":"To this end, we follow the strategy outlined in Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1107.5813","title":"Dark Matter Searches: The Nightmare Scenario","url":"/paper/1107.5813","section":"Cosmological and collider constraints","sentence":"We refer the reader to [ref] for a detailed description of the likelihood function.","intent_p":0.82,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1011.5935","title":"Quantifying the tension between the Higgs mass and (g-2)_mu in the CMSSM","url":"/paper/1011.5935","section":"Quantifying the tension between $m_h$ and $a_μ$","sentence":"For the numerical calculation we have used the MultiNest [ref] algorithm as implemented in the code [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1912.01758","title":"Generalized Blind Spots for Dark Matter Direct Detection in the 2HDM","url":"/paper/1912.01758","section":"Alignment from decoupling","sentence":"To that end, we have constructed a joint likelihood function, as follows [equation] where $_$ is implemented as an upper bound with a smeared step-function [ref] , centered at the observed value [ref] . $_Xenon1T$ is calculated using RAPIDD [ref] , a surrogate model for fast computation of the expected DM spectrum in direct detection experiments, tuned to the latest XENON1T results [ref] .","intent_p":0.91,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":1,"sentences":1,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"0705.0487","title":"Natural Priors, CMSSM Fits and LHC Weather Forecasts","url":"/paper/0705.0487","section":"The Likelihood","sentence":"Bounds upon the sparticle spectrum have been updated and are based upon the bounds collected in Ref. [ref] .","intent_p":0.95,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"comparison","label":"Compares with it","papers":8,"sentences":13,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"0705.0487","title":"Natural Priors, CMSSM Fits and LHC Weather Forecasts","url":"/paper/0705.0487","section":"CMSSM Fits With the New Priors","sentence":"The sparticle mass distributions for priors that are flat in $tanβ$ were displayed in Refs. [ref] and show a spread up to much higher values of the masses.","intent_p":0.88,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0911.4686","title":"MSSM Forecast for the LHC","url":"/paper/0911.4686","section":"High-energy vs Low-energy regions and the EW breaking","sentence":"[ref] However, the precise value of this upper bound turns out to be irrelevant, as the region of very large $tanβ$ is strongly suppressed (see the discussion after eq.","intent_p":0.97,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0806.1923","title":"Panglossian Prospects for Detecting Neutralino Dark Matter in Light of Natural Priors","url":"/paper/0806.1923","section":"Direct Detection","sentence":"Despite our updated constraints and additional observables, the flat $tanβ$ posterior looks indistinguishable to the eye to previous determinations [ref] , where the connection between a preference for the focus point and good direct detection prospects were pointed out.","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0707.3447","title":"Prediction for the Lightest Higgs Boson Mass in the CMSSM using Indirect Experimental Constraints","url":"/paper/0707.3447","section":"Multi-parameter Fit to Experimental Observables","sentence":"In addition, unlike the present work, the analyses of Refs. [ref] apply the direct experimental search results from LEP when estimating the most probable value for $m_h$.","intent_p":0.94,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0807.4512","title":"Bayesian Selection of sign(mu) within mSUGRA in Global Fits Including WMAP5 Results","url":"/paper/0807.4512","section":"Updated Parameter Constraints","sentence":"This is primarily due to $M_W$ and $sin^2 θ_w^l$: our calculation includes 2-loop MSSM effects and so we are able to place smaller errors on the theoretical prediction than Refs. [ref] .","intent_p":0.92,"contests_p":null}]},{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":25,"sentences":29,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"0705.0487","title":"Natural Priors, CMSSM Fits and LHC Weather Forecasts","url":"/paper/0705.0487","section":"Introduction","sentence":"In [ref] , Bayesian statements were made about the posterior probability density of the CMSSM, after indirect data had been taken into account.","intent_p":0.9,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0707.3447","title":"Prediction for the Lightest Higgs Boson Mass in the CMSSM using Indirect Experimental Constraints","url":"/paper/0707.3447","section":"Introduction","sentence":"More recently, many studies have been performed to extract the preferred values for the CMSSM parameters using low-energy precision data, bounds from astrophysical observables and flavour related observables [ref] .","intent_p":0.85,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0807.4512","title":"Bayesian Selection of sign(mu) within mSUGRA in Global Fits Including WMAP5 Results","url":"/paper/0807.4512","section":"Introduction","sentence":"Recently, Bayesian parameter estimation techniques using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling have been applied to the study of mSUGRA, performing a multi–dimensional Bayesian fit to indirect constraints [ref] .","intent_p":0.93,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0910.3950","title":"A Profile Likelihood Analysis of the Constrained MSSM with Genetic Algorithms","url":"/paper/0910.3950","section":"CMSSM likelihood","sentence":"For a detailed discussion, the reader is referred to previous papers [ref] .","intent_p":0.99,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"1111.0710","title":"Supersymmetry vis-\\`a-vis Observation: Dark Matter Constraints, Global Fits and Statistical Issues","url":"/paper/1111.0710","section":"Scanning algorithms","sentence":"[ref] ) or their different variations such as [ref] , which is an algorithm based on nested sampling [ref] (We do not describe these methods here and instead refer the interested readers to the given references for introductions and detailed descriptions).","intent_p":0.88,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":49},"outgoing":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":{"arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0602028","kind":"model","paper_version":3,"prompt_version":"held-up-v3.5","generated_at":"2026-10-27T19:39:16+00:00","loaded_at":"2026-10-28T01:03:32.787939+00:00","evidence":"substantial","account":[],"groups":[{"kind":"method_or_tool","label":"Uses its method or tool","papers":8,"entries":[{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2009,"title":"A novel determination of the local dark matter density","arxiv_id":"0907.0018"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Used the Markov Chain Monte Carlo routines of Superbayes from this paper, which generate Markov chains by means of the Metropolis algorithm, in its FORTRAN code."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2015,"title":"Explaining the Fermi Galactic Centre Excess in the CMSSM","arxiv_id":"1510.00714"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Accounted for positive measurements with a Gaussian likelihood and implemented upper limits as described in this paper."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2016,"title":"Disfavouring Electroweak Baryogenesis and a hidden Higgs in a CP-violating Two-Higgs-Doublet Model","arxiv_id":"1611.05757"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Followed this paper's approach for 95% CL exclusion limits, formulating a likelihood that is a step function at the observed limit smeared by a 5% gaussian uncertainty."},{"p":0.95,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2018,"title":"The Power of Genetic Algorithms: what remains of the pMSSM?","arxiv_id":"1805.03615"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Constructed smeared step-function likelihoods at 95% CL for generic limits implemented in another work, as in this paper."}],"papers_all":29,"self_papers":4,"self_entries":[{"p":0.82,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":true,"year":2011,"title":"Dark Matter Searches: The Nightmare Scenario","arxiv_id":"1107.5813"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Referred the reader to this paper for a detailed description of the likelihood function."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":true,"year":2012,"title":"Bayesian Implications of Current LHC Supersymmetry and Dark Matter Detection Searches for the Constrained MSSM","arxiv_id":"1202.1503"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Included the uncertainty in the likelihood following this paper's procedure for the treatment of upper bounds."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":true,"year":2012,"title":"The Constrained NMSSM with a 126 GeV Higgs boson: A global analysis","arxiv_id":"1211.1693"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Following this paper's procedure, implemented positive measurements through a Gaussian likelihood and upper or lower limits through an error function smeared with theory and, when available, experimental error."},{"p":1.0,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":true,"year":2013,"title":"Two ultimate tests of constrained supersymmetry","arxiv_id":"1302.5956"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Following this paper's procedure, implemented positive measurements through a Gaussian likelihood with experimental and theoretical uncertainties added in quadrature."}]},{"kind":"data_used","label":"Uses its data or values","papers":1,"entries":[{"p":0.95,"quote":null,"citing":[{"self":false,"year":2007,"title":"Natural Priors, CMSSM Fits and LHC Weather Forecasts","arxiv_id":"0705.0487"}],"verified":true,"paraphrase":"Based its updated bounds upon the sparticle spectrum bounds collected in this paper."}],"papers_all":1,"self_papers":0,"self_entries":[]}],"counts":{"by_kind":{"data_used":1,"comparison":8,"method_or_tool":29,"supports_this_paper":1},"dropped":{"relied_on":0,"unknown_ids":0,"account_lines":0,"contest_vetoed":0,"below_threshold":0,"contest_drawback":0,"contest_without_basis":0,"contest_not_one_sentence":0,"contest_on_group_citation":0},"papers_read":14,"self_papers":22,"citing_papers":74,"sentences_read":18,"citing_sentences":129,"unambiguous_read":18,"typed_independent":22,"independent_papers":52,"by_kind_independent":{"data_used":1,"comparison":4,"method_or_tool":17,"supports_this_paper":1}},"input_sha256":"0fb0ac3a0670168086d1c28bdec441582c315f36136d9d90037ec5ff8e93b314","method":"For a paper with five or more citing arXiv papers, Pith selected up to 40 citing sentences its citation classifier typed, read those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote one paraphrase for each later paper in each group, each resting on one sentence. A later paper is listed under a label only when the classifier gives one of its sentences that label at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading of the sentence finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check of the paraphrase against the sentence passes. The section lists uses only: building on the paper, using its method, tool, data or values, comparing with it and citing it as support. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence says nothing about how the paper has been received. Code counted the papers, wrote the summary from the listed entries, set the evidence level and linked each entry to its citing paper. Quotes are copied from the citing sentence and shown only when the citing paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0; otherwise the paraphrase is shown. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart. A paper with fewer citing papers gets a line counted by code, which names uses only: a later paper whose only label is a contest is counted as not described.","line":null,"summary":"5 later papers by other authors are listed below: 4 used its method or tool and 1 used its data or values. 4 more papers by the same authors are listed: 4 used its method or tool."},"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/hep-ph/0602028"}}