{"arxiv_id":"hep-th/0012152","incoming":{"papers":9,"sentences":17,"groups":[{"kind":"background","label":"Cites it as background","papers":3,"sentences":3,"quotes":[{"arxiv_id":"2510.25832","title":"The dark dimension, proton decay, and the length of the M-theory interval","url":"/paper/2510.25832","section":"Estimates in the full 11d theory","sentence":"Considering vanishing 4-form flux $G_4$ along the interval direction, $G_MNPQ11=0$, the 11d metric takes the form [ref] [equation] with $h_mn$ the CY metric and $x^11∈[0,π]$.","intent_p":0.84,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0708.4414","title":"Large Gravitational Waves and Lyth Bound in Multi Brane Inflation","url":"/paper/0708.4414","section":"Multi M5-Brane Inflation","sentence":"The $N=1$ supersymmetric compactification of heterotic M-theory down to four dimensions takes place on a seven-manifold $×$, built out of a Calabi-Yau threefold $$ which is fibered, via a warp-factor, along the orbifold interval $$ [ref] , [ref] .","intent_p":1.0,"contests_p":null},{"arxiv_id":"0705.4682","title":"Chasing Brane Inflation in String-Theory","url":"/paper/0705.4682","section":"Comments and Conclusions","sentence":"In view of the difficulties that the KKLMMT scenario currently presents for the embedding of brane inflation into string theory, it might be interesting to look for qualitatively distinct scenarios such as multi brane inflation [ref] , [ref] in heterotic M-theory which is based on phenomenologically very interesting flux compactifications [ref] , [ref] , [ref] or related constructions in heterotic string theory [ref] .","intent_p":0.9,"contests_p":null}]}],"unlabelled_sentences":14},"outgoing":{"papers":0,"sentences":0,"groups":[],"unlabelled_sentences":0},"claims":[],"thresholds":{"intent_p":0.8,"supports_p":0.95,"contests_p":0.7},"method":"Citing sentences come from each paper's LaTeX source; every \\cite marks the sentence and the works it cites. Pith's classifier typed each sentence. A label is shown at intent probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more. Measured accuracy against two blind model families is at https://pith.science/accuracy. The quoted sentences are the citing authors' own.","held_up":null,"_links":{"html":"https://pith.science/paper/hep-th/0012152"}}