{"paper":{"title":"VSBL Electron Neutrino Disappearance","arxiv_id":"0902.1992","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2009-02-11T22:15:47+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.94,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"We consider possible indications of Very-Short-BaseLine (VSBL) electron neutrino disappearance into sterile neutrinos in MiniBooNE neutrino data and Gallium radioactive source experiments.","hedge":{"p":0.94,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.36,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.06,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.94,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.91,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We discuss the compatibility of such a disappearance with reactor and MiniBooNE antineutrino data.","hedge":{"p":0.79,"label":"unclear"},"own_p":0.59,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.08,"result":0.0,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.91,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.58,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"We find a tension between neutrino and antineutrino data which could be due to: 1) statistical fluctuations; 2) underestimate of systematic uncertainties; 3) exclusion of our hypothesis of VSBL nu_e disappearance; 4) a violation of CPT symmetry.","hedge":{"p":0.52,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.3,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.18,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.42,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.58}},{"i":3,"p":0.99,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Considering the first possibility, we present the results of a combined fit of all data, which indicate that P_{ee} < 1 with 97.04 CL.","hedge":{"p":0.58,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.37,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":1.0,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We consider also the possibility of CPT violation, which leads to the best-fit value A_{ee}^{CPT,bf} = -0.17 for the asymmetry of the nu_e and antinu_e survival probabilities and A_{ee}^{CPT} < 0 at 99.7 CL.","hedge":{"p":0.59,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.21,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.54,"text":"Considering the first possibility, we present the results of a combined fit of all data, which indicate that P_{ee} < 1 with 97.04 CL.","location":"abstract s3","hedge_strength":{"p":0.58,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4468,"cost_usd_reported":0.000188},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.02,"states_limitation":0.77,"human_participants":0.03,"controlled_comparison":0.27,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.98,"compares_with_prior_results":0.64,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":1.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.52,"value":"empirical study","probabilities":{"review":0.01,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.52,"simulation_study":0.19,"theoretical_result":0.26,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.02}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.57,"text":"Considering the first possibility, we present the results of a combined fit of all data, which indicate that P_{ee} < 1 with 97.04 CL.","location":"abstract s3"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}