{"paper":{"title":"Distinguishing Dark Matter Stabilization Symmetries Using Multiple Kinematic Edges and Cusps","arxiv_id":"1003.0899","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2010-03-04T12:14:09+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.92,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"We emphasize that the stabilizing symmetry for dark matter (DM) particles does not have to be the commonly used parity (Z_2) symmetry.","hedge":{"p":0.73,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.14,"main_claim_p":0.14,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.14,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.04,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.92,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.98,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We therefore examine the potential of the colliders to distinguish models with parity stabilized DM from models in which the DM is stabilized by other symmetries.","hedge":{"p":0.64,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.59,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.21,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.98,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.72,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We often take the latter to be a Z_3 symmetry for illustration.","hedge":{"p":0.83,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.55,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.37,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.72,"result":0.0,"background":0.19,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.08,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.56,"id":"s3","own":false,"role":"method","text":"We focus on signatures where a single particle, charged under the DM stabilization symmetry decays into the DM and Standard Model (SM) particles.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.44,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.31,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.56,"result":0.0,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.43,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.52,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"method","text":"Such a Z_3-charged \"mother\" particle can decay into one or two DM particles along with the same SM particles.","hedge":{"p":0.75,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.32,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.66,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.52,"result":0.02,"background":0.19,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.26,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":5,"p":0.6,"id":"s5","own":false,"role":"background","text":"This can be contrasted with the decay of a Z_2-charged mother particle, where only one DM particle appears.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.16,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.84,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.21,"result":0.06,"background":0.6,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.09,"interpretation":0.04}},{"i":6,"p":0.9,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Thus, if the intermediate particles in these decay chains are off-shell, then the reconstructed invariant mass of the SM particles exhibits two kinematic edges for the Z_3 case but only one for the Z_2 case.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.65,"main_claim_p":0.29,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.97,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.03,"result":0.9,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.05}},{"i":7,"p":0.63,"id":"s7","own":false,"role":"limitation","text":"For the case of on-shell intermediate particles, distinguishing the two symmetries requires more than the kinematic edges.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.43,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.33,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.05,"method":0.03,"result":0.18,"background":0.03,"limitation":0.63,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.04}},{"i":8,"p":0.51,"id":"s8","own":true,"role":"result","text":"In this case, we note that certain decay chain \"topologies\" of the mother particle which are present for the Z_3 case (but absent for the Z_2 case) generate a \"cusp\" in the invariant mass distribution of the SM particles.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.74,"main_claim_p":0.25,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.35,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.19,"result":0.51,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.28,"interpretation":0.02}},{"i":9,"p":0.96,"id":"s9","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We demonstrate that this cusp is generally invariant of the various spin configurations.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.88,"main_claim_p":0.13,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.08,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.96,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.02}},{"i":10,"p":0.81,"id":"s10","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We further apply these techniques within the context of explicit models.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.88,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.02,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.19,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.81,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.56,"text":"In this case, we note that certain decay chain \"topologies\" of the mother particle which are present for the Z_3 case (but absent for the Z_2 case) generate a \"cusp\" in the invariant mass distribution of the SM particles.","location":"abstract s8","hedge_strength":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":8176,"cost_usd_reported":0.000343},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.56,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.44,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.21,"compares_with_prior_results":0.48,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.66,"value":"proof or derivation","probabilities":{"argument":0.31,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.66,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.03}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.64,"value":"method or tool","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.64,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.36,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.54,"text":"In this case, we note that certain decay chain \"topologies\" of the mother particle which are present for the Z_3 case (but absent for the Z_2 case) generate a \"cusp\" in the invariant mass distribution of the SM particles.","location":"abstract s8"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":11,"sentences_in_abstract":11},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}