{"paper":{"title":"Merging and Clustering of the Swift BAT AGN Sample","arxiv_id":"1006.0228","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2010-06-01T20:00:04+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We discuss the merger rate, close galaxy environment, and clustering on scales up to a Mpc of the SWIFT BAT hard X-ray sample of nearby (z<0.05), moderate-luminosity active galactic nuclei (AGN).","hedge":{"p":0.79,"label":"unclear"},"own_p":0.68,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.91,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":1.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find a higher incidence of galaxies with signs of disruption compared to a matched control sample (18% versus 1%) and of close pairs within 30 kpc (24% versus 1%).","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.97,"main_claim_p":0.41,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":1.0,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We also find a larger fraction with companions compared to normal galaxies and optical emission line selected AGN at scales up to 250 kpc.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.17,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.92,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":1.0,"id":"s3","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"We hypothesize that these merging AGN may not be identified using optical emission line diagnostics because of optical extinction and dilution by star formation.","hedge":{"p":0.94,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.1,"main_claim_p":0.12,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":1.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.85,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"In support of this hypothesis, in merging systems we find a higher hard X-ray to [OIII] flux ratio, as well as emission line diagnostics characteristic of composite or star-forming galaxies, and a larger IRAS 60 um to stellar mass ratio.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.15,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.31,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.85,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.15}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.62,"text":"We find a higher incidence of galaxies with signs of disruption compared to a matched control sample (18% versus 1%) and of close pairs within 30 kpc (24% versus 1%).","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4424,"cost_usd_reported":0.000186},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.34,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.98,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.99,"compares_with_prior_results":0.91,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.87,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.87,"observation_or_experiment":0.13,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"empirical study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":1.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.72,"text":"We discuss the merger rate, close galaxy environment, and clustering on scales up to a Mpc of the SWIFT BAT hard X-ray sample of nearby (z<0.05), moderate-luminosity active galactic nuclei (AGN).","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}