{"paper":{"title":"D0 Dimuon Asymmetry in $B_s - \\bar B_s$ Mixing and Constraints on New Physics","arxiv_id":"1006.1682","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2010-06-09T02:14:38+00:00","version_compiled":"v3"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v3","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.56,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"We study the consequences of the large dimuon asymmetry observed at D0.","hedge":{"p":0.67,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.43,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.24,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.44,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.56,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.68,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"Physics beyond the standard model (SM) in $B_s-\\bar B_s$ mixing is required to explain the data.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.2,"main_claim_p":0.66,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.29,"background":0.03,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.68}},{"i":2,"p":0.84,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We first present a detailed analysis for model independent constraints on physics beyond the SM, and then study the implications for theoretical models which modify the SM results in different ways, such as $Z'$ with FCNC and R-parity violating SUSY contributions.","hedge":{"p":0.86,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.89,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.16,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.84,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"Physics beyond the standard model (SM) in $B_s-\\bar B_s$ mixing is required to explain the data.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":2949,"cost_usd_reported":0.000124},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.09,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.08,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.08,"compares_with_prior_results":0.16,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.89,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.04,"literature":0.01,"proof_or_derivation":0.04,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.89,"observation_or_experiment":0.02,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":1.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":1.0,"text":"We first present a detailed analysis for model independent constraints on physics beyond the SM, and then study the implications for theoretical models which modify the SM results in different ways, such as $Z'$ with FCNC and R-parity violating SUSY contributions.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v3"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":3,"sentences_in_abstract":3},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448,"review_comments_judged":{"judged_by":["gpt-5.6-luna","grok-4.7"],"judged_against":"Pith's own text copy of each paper: text extracted from the PDF, the first 90,000 characters","measured_on":"2026-10-04","accurate":113,"decided":149,"sampled_reviews":200,"split_by_lane":false,"by_lane":"https://pith.science/accuracy#by-lane"}}}