{"paper":{"title":"Supersymmetric Configurations, Geometric Transitions and New Non-Kahler Manifolds","arxiv_id":"1007.5316","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2010-07-29T20:06:23+00:00","version_compiled":"v3"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v3","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.97,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We give a detailed derivation of a supersymmetric configuration of wrapped D5-branes on a two-cycle of a warped resolved conifold.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.37,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.02,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.97,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.96,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Our analysis reveals that the resolved conifold should support a non-Kahler metric with an SU(3) structure.","hedge":{"p":0.82,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.32,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.96,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.04}},{"i":2,"p":0.89,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We use this as a starting point of the geometric transition in type IIB theory.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.75,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.02,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.89,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.11,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.74,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"method","text":"A mirror, and a subsequent flop transition using an intermediate M-theory configuration with a G_2 structure, gives rise to the complete IR geometric transition in type IIA theory.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.75,"main_claim_p":0.13,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.74,"result":0.09,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.17,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.71,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"A further mirror transformation gives the type IIB gravity dual of the IR gauge theory on the wrapped D5-branes.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.78,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.16,"result":0.71,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.1,"interpretation":0.03}},{"i":5,"p":0.54,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"Expectedly non-Kahler deformations of the resolved and the deformed conifolds appear as the gravity duals of the confining gauge theories in type IIA and type IIB theories respectively, although in more generic cases these manifolds could also be non-geometric.","hedge":{"p":0.74,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.55,"main_claim_p":0.34,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.45,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.54}},{"i":6,"p":0.91,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"result","text":"In the local limit we reproduce precisely the scenarios presented in our earlier works.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.82,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.33,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.91,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.09}},{"i":7,"p":0.94,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"Our present work should therefore be viewed as providing a supergravity proof of geometric transitions in the full global scenarios in type II theories.","hedge":{"p":0.69,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.75,"main_claim_p":0.75,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.05,"interpretation":0.94}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.98,"text":"Our present work should therefore be viewed as providing a supergravity proof of geometric transitions in the full global scenarios in type II theories.","location":"abstract s7","hedge_strength":{"p":0.69,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":6251,"cost_usd_reported":0.000263},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.07,"states_limitation":0.63,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.02,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.03,"compares_with_prior_results":0.9,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"proof or derivation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":1.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":1.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.84,"text":"Our present work should therefore be viewed as providing a supergravity proof of geometric transitions in the full global scenarios in type II theories.","location":"abstract s7"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v3"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":8,"sentences_in_abstract":8},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}