{"paper":{"title":"Estimation of multi-particle correlation from multiplicity distribution observed in relativisitic heavy ion collisions","arxiv_id":"1012.2525","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2010-12-12T08:41:15+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.58,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"method","text":"Analytical formula for multiplicity distribution is derived in the QO approach, where chaotic and coherent fields are contained.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.85,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.58,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.42,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.77,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"method","text":"Observed charged multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=200$ AGeV and in pp collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=900$ GeV are analyzed by the formula.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.84,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.84,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.77,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.23,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.49,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Chaoticity parameters in the inclusive events estimated from the analysis of multiplicity distributions are compared with those estimated from the analysis of observed two-particle inclusive identical particle correlations.","hedge":{"p":0.88,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.89,"main_claim_p":0.25,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.6,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.2,"result":0.49,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.3,"interpretation":0.01}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.98,"text":"Chaoticity parameters in the inclusive events estimated from the analysis of multiplicity distributions are compared with those estimated from the analysis of observed two-particle inclusive identical particle correlations.","location":"abstract s2","hedge_strength":{"p":0.88,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":2987,"cost_usd_reported":0.000125},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.07,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.14,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.09,"compares_with_prior_results":0.91,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.99,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.01,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.99,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.8,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.1,"empirical_study":0.1,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.8,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.86,"text":"Analytical formula for multiplicity distribution is derived in the QO approach, where chaotic and coherent fields are contained.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":3,"sentences_in_abstract":3},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}