{"paper":{"title":"Large spin expansion of semiclassical 3-point correlators in AdS_5 x S^5","arxiv_id":"1012.2760","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2010-12-13T15:29:06+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.89,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"3-point correlators in AdS_5xS^5 string theory in which two states are \"heavy\" (have large quantum numbers) and the third is \"light\" (here chosen as chiral primary scalar) can be computed semiclassically in terms of the \"light\" vertex operator evaluated on the classical string solution sourced by the two \"heavy\" operators.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.12,"main_claim_p":0.09,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.36,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.1,"result":0.0,"background":0.89,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.78,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We observe that in the case when the \"heavy\" operators represent BPS states there is an ambiguity in the computation depending on whether the mass shell (or marginality) condition is imposed before or after integration over the world sheet.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.82,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.18,"method":0.0,"result":0.78,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.53,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We show that this ambiguity is resolved in a universal way by defining the BPS correlator as a limit of the one with non-BPS \"heavy\" states.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.25,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.08,"result":0.53,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.39,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.8,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We consider several examples with \"heavy\" states represented by folded or circular spinning strings in AdS_5xS^5 that admit a point-like BMN-type limit when one S^5 spin J is much larger than the others.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.75,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.89,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.2,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.8,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.99,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Remarkably, in all of these cases the large J expansion of the 3-point correlator has the same structure as expected in perturbative (tree-level and one-loop) dual gauge theory.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.88,"main_claim_p":0.4,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.55,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":5,"p":0.82,"id":"s5","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"We conjecture that, like the leading chiral primary correlator term, the coefficients of the first few subleading terms are also protected, i.e. should be the same at strong and weak coupling.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"speculative"},"own_p":0.19,"main_claim_p":0.37,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.46,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.17,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.82}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.8,"text":"Remarkably, in all of these cases the large J expansion of the 3-point correlator has the same structure as expected in perturbative (tree-level and one-loop) dual gauge theory.","location":"abstract s4","hedge_strength":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5248,"cost_usd_reported":0.00022},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.69,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.04,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.05,"compares_with_prior_results":0.77,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.95,"value":"proof or derivation","probabilities":{"argument":0.02,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.95,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.03}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":1.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.94,"text":"We show that this ambiguity is resolved in a universal way by defining the BPS correlator as a limit of the one with non-BPS \"heavy\" states.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":6,"sentences_in_abstract":6},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}