{"paper":{"title":"A data-driven method of pile-up correction for the substructure of massive jets","arxiv_id":"1101.3002","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2011-01-15T16:29:40+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.89,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We describe a method to measure and subtract the incoherent component of energy flow arising from multiple interactions from jet shape/substructure observables of ultra-massive jets.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.25,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.11,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.89,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.38,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The amount subtracted is a function of the jet shape variable of interest and not a universal property.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.54,"main_claim_p":0.18,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.35,"result":0.38,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.18,"interpretation":0.09}},{"i":2,"p":0.93,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"Such a correction is expected to significantly reduce any bias in the corresponding distributions generated by the presence of multiple interactions, and to improve measurement resolution.","hedge":{"p":0.93,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.12,"main_claim_p":0.29,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.04,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.93}},{"i":3,"p":0.44,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"Since in our method the correction is obtained from the data, it is not subject to uncertainties coming from the use of theoretical calculations and/or Monte Carlo event generators.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.72,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.4,"result":0.02,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.14,"interpretation":0.44}},{"i":4,"p":0.69,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We derive our correction method for the jet mass, angularity and planar flow.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.97,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.3,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.69,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":1.0,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find these corrections to be in good agreement with data on massive jets observed by the CDF collaboration.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.21,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.49,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":0.8,"id":"s6","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"Finally, we comment on the linkage with the concept of jet area and jet mass area.","hedge":{"p":0.92,"label":"unclear"},"own_p":0.45,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.02,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.02,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.14,"contribution":0.03,"interpretation":0.8}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.53,"text":"We find these corrections to be in good agreement with data on massive jets observed by the CDF collaboration.","location":"abstract s5","hedge_strength":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5480,"cost_usd_reported":0.00023},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.19,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.09,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.06,"compares_with_prior_results":0.61,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.89,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.01,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.89,"observation_or_experiment":0.1,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"method or tool","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":1.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.99,"text":"We describe a method to measure and subtract the incoherent component of energy flow arising from multiple interactions from jet shape/substructure observables of ultra-massive jets.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":7,"sentences_in_abstract":7},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}