{"paper":{"title":"W mass and Leptonic Z-decays in the NMSSM","arxiv_id":"1101.4758","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2011-01-25T09:53:32+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We study a subset of electroweak-precision observables consisting of $M_W$, $\\sin^2\\theta_{{\\tiny eff}}^{\\tau}$, $BR(Z\\to\\tau^+\\tau^-)$ and $\\Gamma(Z\\to\\tau^+\\tau^-)/\\Gamma(Z\\to e^+e^-)-1$ (characterizing leptonic $Z$-decays) in the context of the NMSSM.","hedge":{"p":0.81,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.76,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.25,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":1.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.92,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"After a brief review of common MSSM-NMSSM effects, e.g. for $\\Gamma(Z\\to\\tau^+\\tau^-)/\\Gamma(Z\\to e^+e^-)-1$, which has been little discussed, even in the MSSM), specific NMSSM scenarios are studied, with the result that the NMSSM, considering existing constraints on its spectrum, is essentially consistent with available measurements, given the current accuracy.","hedge":{"p":0.74,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.8,"main_claim_p":0.92,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.14,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.92,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.03}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"After a brief review of common MSSM-NMSSM effects, e.g. for $\\Gamma(Z\\to\\tau^+\\tau^-)/\\Gamma(Z\\to e^+e^-)-1$, which has been little discussed, even in the MSSM), specific NMSSM scenarios are studied, with the result that the NMSSM, considering existing constraints on its spectrum, is essentially consistent with available measurements, given the current accuracy.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":0.74,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":2639,"cost_usd_reported":0.000111},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.06,"states_limitation":0.62,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.1,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.08,"compares_with_prior_results":0.35,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.68,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.03,"literature":0.01,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.27,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.68}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.57,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.01,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.42,"theoretical_result":0.57,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.72,"text":"After a brief review of common MSSM-NMSSM effects, e.g. for $\\Gamma(Z\\to\\tau^+\\tau^-)/\\Gamma(Z\\to e^+e^-)-1$, which has been little discussed, even in the MSSM), specific NMSSM scenarios are studied, with the result that the NMSSM, considering existing constraints on its spectrum, is essentially consistent with available measurements, given the current accuracy.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":2,"sentences_in_abstract":2},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}