{"paper":{"title":"On the mass distribution of neutron stars","arxiv_id":"1101.4872","primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","submitted_at":"2011-01-25T16:56:26+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.96,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"method","text":"The distribution of masses for neutron stars is analyzed using the Bayesian statistical inference, evaluating the likelihood of proposed gaussian peaks by using fifty-four measured points obtained in a variety of systems.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.89,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.95,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.96,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The results strongly suggest the existence of a bimodal distribution of the masses, with the first peak around $1.37 {M_{\\odot}}$, and a much wider second peak at $1.73 {M_{\\odot}}$.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.8,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":1.0,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"The results support earlier views related to the different evolutionary histories of the members for the first two peaks, which produces a natural separation (even if no attempt to \"label\" the systems has been made here), and argues against the single-mass scale viewpoint.","hedge":{"p":0.87,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.45,"main_claim_p":0.2,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.26,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":1.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.56,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"The bimodal distribution can also accommodate the recent findings of $\\sim M_{\\odot}$ masses quite naturally.","hedge":{"p":0.64,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.64,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.83,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.43,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.56}},{"i":4,"p":0.82,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Finally, we explore the existence of a subgroup around $1.25 {M_{\\odot}}$, finding weak, if any, evidence for it.","hedge":{"p":0.56,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.96,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.82,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.18,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.86,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"result","text":"This recently claimed low-mass subgroup, possibly related to $O-Mg-Ne$ core collapse events, has a monotonically decreasing likelihood and does not stand out clearly from the rest of the sample.","hedge":{"p":0.58,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.73,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.37,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.86,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.13}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"The results strongly suggest the existence of a bimodal distribution of the masses, with the first peak around $1.37 {M_{\\odot}}$, and a much wider second peak at $1.73 {M_{\\odot}}$.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":0.95,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5068,"cost_usd_reported":0.000213},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.89,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.07,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.98,"compares_with_prior_results":0.85,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":1.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.74,"value":"empirical study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.02,"empirical_study":0.74,"simulation_study":0.04,"theoretical_result":0.19,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.01}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.73,"text":"The distribution of masses for neutron stars is analyzed using the Bayesian statistical inference, evaluating the likelihood of proposed gaussian peaks by using fifty-four measured points obtained in a variety of systems.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":6,"sentences_in_abstract":6},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}