{"paper":{"title":"Reconciling anomalous measurements in $B_s-\\bar{B}_s$ mixing: the role of CPT-conserving and CPT-violating new physics","arxiv_id":"1105.0970","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2011-05-05T03:37:35+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Recently observed anomalies in the $B_s \\to J/\\psi \\phi$ decay and the like-sign dimuon asymmetry $A^b_{sl}$ hint at possible new physics (NP) in the $\\bsbsbar$ mixing.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.06,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.94,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We parameterize the NP with four model-independent quantities: the magnitudes and phases of the dispersive part $M_{12}$ and the absorptive part $\\Gamma_{12}$ of the NP contribution to the effective Hamiltonian.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.65,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.94,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.06,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.99,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We constrain these parameters using the four observables $\\Delta M_s$, $\\Delta\\Gamma_s$, the mixing phase $\\beta_s^{J/\\psi\\phi}$, and $A^b_{sl}$.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.87,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.69,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.99,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.99,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Our quantitative fit indicates that the NP should contribute a significant dispersive as well as absorptive part.","hedge":{"p":0.91,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.28,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.26,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":4,"p":0.97,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"In fact, models that do not contribute a new absorptive part are disfavored at more than 99% confidence level.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.9,"main_claim_p":0.23,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.97,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.03}},{"i":5,"p":0.8,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We extend this formalism to include CPT violation, and show that CPT violation by itself, or even in presence of CPT-conserving new physics without an absorptive part, helps only marginally in the simultaneous resolution of these anomalies.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.2,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.31,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.02,"result":0.8,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.16,"interpretation":0.02}},{"i":6,"p":0.99,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"The NP absorptive contribution to $\\bsbsbar$ mixing therefore seems to be essential, and would imply a large branching fraction for channels like $B_s \\to \\tau^+ \\tau^-$.","hedge":{"p":0.88,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.84,"main_claim_p":0.77,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.11,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.99}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.98,"text":"The NP absorptive contribution to $\\bsbsbar$ mixing therefore seems to be essential, and would imply a large branching fraction for channels like $B_s \\to \\tau^+ \\tau^-$.","location":"abstract s6","hedge_strength":{"p":0.88,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5861,"cost_usd_reported":0.000246},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.46,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.15,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.97,"compares_with_prior_results":0.29,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.95,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.95,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.05}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.96,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.02,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.02,"theoretical_result":0.96,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.74,"text":"We extend this formalism to include CPT violation, and show that CPT violation by itself, or even in presence of CPT-conserving new physics without an absorptive part, helps only marginally in the simultaneous resolution of these anomalies.","location":"abstract s5"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":7,"sentences_in_abstract":7},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448,"review_comments_judged":{"judged_by":["gpt-5.6-luna","grok-4.7"],"judged_against":"Pith's own text copy of each paper: text extracted from the PDF, the first 90,000 characters","measured_on":"2026-10-04","accurate":113,"decided":149,"sampled_reviews":200,"split_by_lane":false,"by_lane":"https://pith.science/accuracy#by-lane"}}}