{"paper":{"title":"Guide to transverse projections and mass-constraining variables","arxiv_id":"1105.2977","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2011-05-15T23:21:58+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.76,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"This paper seeks to demonstrate that many of the existing mass-measurement variables proposed for hadron colliders (mT, mEff, mT2, missing pT, hT, rootsHatMin, etc.) are far more closely related to each other than is widely appreciated, and indeed can all be viewed as a common mass bound specialized for a variety of purposes.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.29,"main_claim_p":0.85,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.74,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.0,"result":0.22,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.76,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.98,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"A consequence of this is that one may understand better the strengths and weaknesses of each variable, and the circumstances in which each can be used to best effect.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.19,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.98}},{"i":2,"p":0.89,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"method","text":"In order to achieve this, we find it necessary first to revisit the seemingly empty and infertile wilderness populated by the subscript \"T\" (as in pT) in order to remind ourselves what this process of transversification actually means.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.74,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.89,"result":0.0,"background":0.04,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.06,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.59,"id":"s3","own":false,"role":"background","text":"We note that, far from being simple, transversification can mean quite different things to different people.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.39,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.08,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.33,"method":0.01,"result":0.05,"background":0.59,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":4,"p":0.39,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"Those readers who manage to battle through the barrage of transverse notation distinguishing mass-preserving projections from velocity preserving projections, and `early projection' from `late projection', will find their efforts rewarded towards the end of the paper with (i) a better understanding of how collider mass variables fit together, (ii) an appreciation of how these variables could be generalized to search for things more complicated than supersymmetry, (iii) will depart with an aversion to thoughtless or naive use of the so-called `transverse' methods of any of the popular computer Lorentz-vector libraries, and (iv) will take care in their subsequent papers to be explicit about which of the 61 identified variants of the `transverse mass' they are employing.","hedge":{"p":0.76,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.38,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.96,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.19,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.21,"contribution":0.2,"interpretation":0.39}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"This paper seeks to demonstrate that many of the existing mass-measurement variables proposed for hadron colliders (mT, mEff, mT2, missing pT, hT, rootsHatMin, etc.) are far more closely related to each other than is widely appreciated, and indeed can all be viewed as a common mass bound specialized for a variety of purposes.","location":"abstract s0","hedge_strength":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4600,"cost_usd_reported":0.000193},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.05,"states_limitation":0.29,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.02,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.49,"compares_with_prior_results":0.3,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.03},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.82,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.82,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.18,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.42,"value":"position or commentary","probabilities":{"review":0.37,"method_or_tool":0.02,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.19,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.42}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.97,"text":"This paper seeks to demonstrate that many of the existing mass-measurement variables proposed for hadron colliders (mT, mEff, mT2, missing pT, hT, rootsHatMin, etc.) are far more closely related to each other than is widely appreciated, and indeed can all be viewed as a common mass bound specialized for a variety of purposes.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}