{"paper":{"title":"On the DAMA and CoGeNT Modulations","arxiv_id":"1105.3734","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2011-05-18T20:02:08+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"DAMA observes an annual modulation in their event rate, as might be expected from dark matter scatterings, while CoGeNT has reported evidence for a similar modulation.","hedge":{"p":0.55,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.18,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.86,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"The simplest interpretation of these findings in terms of dark matter-nucleus scatterings is excluded by other direct detection experiments.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.08,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.08,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.09,"method":0.0,"result":0.03,"background":0.86,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":2,"p":0.5,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We consider the robustness of these exclusions with respect to assumptions regarding the scattering and find that isospin-violating inelastic dark matter helps alleviate this tension and allows marginal compatibility between experiments.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.73,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.24,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.5,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.49,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":3,"p":0.69,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Isospin-violation can significantly weaken the XENON constraints, while inelasticity enhances the annual modulation fraction of the signal, bringing the CoGeNT and CDMS results into better agreement.","hedge":{"p":0.87,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.61,"main_claim_p":0.39,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.42,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.69,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.3}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.99,"text":"We consider the robustness of these exclusions with respect to assumptions regarding the scattering and find that isospin-violating inelastic dark matter helps alleviate this tension and allows marginal compatibility between experiments.","location":"abstract s2","hedge_strength":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":3662,"cost_usd_reported":0.000154},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.44,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.09,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.06,"compares_with_prior_results":0.89,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.36,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.36,"literature":0.31,"proof_or_derivation":0.01,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.31,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.01}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.82,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.01,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.04,"theoretical_result":0.82,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.13}},"contribution_statement":{"p":1.0,"text":"We consider the robustness of these exclusions with respect to assumptions regarding the scattering and find that isospin-violating inelastic dark matter helps alleviate this tension and allows marginal compatibility between experiments.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":4,"sentences_in_abstract":4},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}