{"paper":{"title":"Radiative Models of Sagittarius A* and M87 from Relativistic MHD Simulations","arxiv_id":"1202.0348","primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","submitted_at":"2012-02-02T03:32:18+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Ongoing millimeter VLBI observations with the Event Horizon Telescope allow unprecedented study of the innermost portion of black hole accretion flows.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.08,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.93,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Interpreting the observations requires relativistic, time-dependent physical modeling.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.06,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.06,"result":0.0,"background":0.93,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.98,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We discuss the comparison of radiative transfer calculations from general relativistic MHD simulations of Sagittarius A* and M87 with current and future mm-VLBI observations.","hedge":{"p":0.76,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.78,"main_claim_p":0.12,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.32,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.02,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.98,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.63,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"This comparison allows estimates of the viewing geometry and physical conditions of the Sgr A* accretion flow.","hedge":{"p":0.61,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.59,"main_claim_p":0.2,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.3,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.06,"interpretation":0.63}},{"i":4,"p":0.81,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"gap","text":"The viewing geometry for M87 is already constrained from observations of its large-scale jet, but, unlike Sgr A*, there is no consensus for its millimeter emission geometry or electron population.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.07,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.4,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.81,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.18,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.57,"id":"s5","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"Despite this uncertainty, as long as the emission region is compact, robust predictions for the size of its jet launching region can be made.","hedge":{"p":0.84,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.4,"main_claim_p":0.17,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.11,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.0,"result":0.37,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.57}},{"i":6,"p":0.49,"id":"s6","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"For both sources, the black hole shadow may be detected with future observations including ALMA and/or the LMT, which would constitute the first direct evidence for a black hole event horizon.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.08,"main_claim_p":0.29,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.12,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.38,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.49}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.76,"text":"For both sources, the black hole shadow may be detected with future observations including ALMA and/or the LMT, which would constitute the first direct evidence for a black hole event horizon.","location":"abstract s6","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5591,"cost_usd_reported":0.000235},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.08,"states_limitation":0.66,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.05,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.07,"compares_with_prior_results":0.37,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.97,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.01,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.02,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.97}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.89,"value":"simulation study","probabilities":{"review":0.09,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.89,"theoretical_result":0.01,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.01}},"contribution_statement":{"p":1.0,"text":"We discuss the comparison of radiative transfer calculations from general relativistic MHD simulations of Sagittarius A* and M87 with current and future mm-VLBI observations.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":7,"sentences_in_abstract":7},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}