{"paper":{"title":"Search for microscopic black holes in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV","arxiv_id":"1202.6396","primary_cat":"hep-ex","submitted_at":"2012-02-28T22:04:30+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"A search for microscopic black holes in pp collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV is presented.","hedge":{"p":0.93,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.85,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":1.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"method","text":"The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 4.7 inverse femtobarns recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2011.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.79,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":1.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.95,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"method","text":"Events with large total transverse energy have been analyzed for the presence of multiple energetic jets, leptons, and photons, which are typical signals of evaporating semiclassical and quantum black holes, and string balls.","hedge":{"p":0.89,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.9,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.95,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.05,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.99,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Agreement with the expected standard model backgrounds, which are dominated by QCD multijet production, has been observed for various combined multiplicities of jets and other reconstructed objects in the final state.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.9,"main_claim_p":0.32,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.2,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":4,"p":0.9,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Model-independent limits are set on new physics processes producing high-multiplicity, energetic final states.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.15,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.23,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.9,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.1,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":1.0,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"result","text":"In addition, new model-specific indicative limits are set excluding semiclassical and quantum black holes with masses below 3.8 to 5.3 TeV and string balls with masses below 4.6 to 4.8 TeV.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.64,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":0.57,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"The analysis has a substantially increased sensitivity compared to previous searches.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.85,"main_claim_p":0.09,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.92,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.26,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.17,"interpretation":0.57}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.87,"text":"In addition, new model-specific indicative limits are set excluding semiclassical and quantum black holes with masses below 3.8 to 5.3 TeV and string balls with masses below 4.6 to 4.8 TeV.","location":"abstract s5","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5633,"cost_usd_reported":0.000237},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.34,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.41,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.99,"compares_with_prior_results":0.9,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.6,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.6,"observation_or_experiment":0.4,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"empirical study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":1.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.72,"text":"In addition, new model-specific indicative limits are set excluding semiclassical and quantum black holes with masses below 3.8 to 5.3 TeV and string balls with masses below 4.6 to 4.8 TeV.","location":"abstract s5"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":7,"sentences_in_abstract":7},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}