{"paper":{"title":"Confronting Top AFB with Parity Violation Constraints","arxiv_id":"1203.1320","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2012-03-06T21:00:02+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.83,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We consider the implications of low-energy precision tests of parity violation on t-channel mediator models explaining the top AFB excess measured by CDF and D0.","hedge":{"p":0.62,"label":"unclear"},"own_p":0.55,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.07,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.17,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.83,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.31,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"method","text":"Flavor-violating u-t or d-t couplings of new scalar or vector mediators generate at one-loop an anomalous contribution to the nuclear weak charge.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.28,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.18,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.31,"result":0.23,"background":0.24,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.2,"interpretation":0.02}},{"i":2,"p":0.98,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"As a result, atomic parity violation constraints disfavor at >3 sigma t-channel models that give rise to a greater than 20% AFB at the parton level for M_tt > 450 GeV while not producing too large a top cross-section.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.73,"main_claim_p":0.88,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.98,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.02}},{"i":3,"p":0.64,"id":"s3","own":false,"role":"future_work","text":"Even stronger constraints are expected through future measurements of the proton weak charge by the Q-Weak experiment.","hedge":{"p":0.8,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.15,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.13,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.06,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.64,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.3}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"As a result, atomic parity violation constraints disfavor at >3 sigma t-channel models that give rise to a greater than 20% AFB at the parton level for M_tt > 450 GeV while not producing too large a top cross-section.","location":"abstract s2","hedge_strength":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":3650,"cost_usd_reported":0.000153},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.4,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.07,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.98,"compares_with_prior_results":0.22,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.41,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.26,"literature":0.07,"proof_or_derivation":0.24,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.41,"observation_or_experiment":0.01,"simulation_or_computation":0.01}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.99,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.99,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.01}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.64,"text":"We consider the implications of low-energy precision tests of parity violation on t-channel mediator models explaining the top AFB excess measured by CDF and D0.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":4,"sentences_in_abstract":4},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}